How do insurance firms respond to financial risk sharing regulations? Evidence from the Affordable Care Act

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many insurance markets have reinstated premium stabilization programs to ensure financial protection from market volatility. In this paper, we focus on one such regulation—risk corridors (RCs)—in the context of the Health Insurance Marketplaces established under the Affordable Care Act. We develop a model to show how the program provided incentives for some insurers to lower their premiums. The RCs program was defunded unexpectedly for coverage year 2016, before its legislated end in 2016. Consistent with the model, we find that making a RCs claim before the program ended is associated with higher premium growth after the program's demise. The model and empirical evidence are consistent with the view that the end of the RCs program contributed to premium growth in the Marketplaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1443-1460
Number of pages18
JournalHealth Economics (United Kingdom)
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • Affordable Care Act
  • Health Insurance Marketplaces
  • risk Corridors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How do insurance firms respond to financial risk sharing regulations? Evidence from the Affordable Care Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this