How accurate is the estimation of anthropogenic carbon in the ocean? An evaluation of the ΔC* method

Katsumi Matsumoto, Nicolas Gruber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Scopus citations

Abstract

The ΔC* method of Gruber et al. (1996) is widely used to estimate the distribution of anthropogenic carbon in the ocean; however, as yet, no thorough assessment of its accuracy has been made. Here we provide a critical re-assessment of the method and determine its accuracy by applying it to synthetic data from a global ocean biogeochemistry model, for which we know the "true" anthropogenic CO2 distribution. Our results indicate that the ΔC* method tends to overestimate anthropogenic carbon in relatively young waters but underestimate it in older waters. Main sources of these biases are (1) the time evolution of the air-sea CO2 disequilibrium, which is not properly accounted for in the ΔC* method, (2) a pCFC ventilation age bias that arises from mixing, and (3) errors in identifying the different end-member water types. We largely support the findings of Hall et al. (2004), who have also identified the first two bias sources. An extrapolation of the errors that we quantified on a number of representative isopycnals to the global ocean suggests a positive bias of about 7% in the ΔC*-derived global anthropogenic CO2 inventory. The magnitude of this bias is within the previously estimated 20% uncertainty of the method, but regional biases can be larger. Finally, we propose two improvements to the ΔC* method in order to account for the evolution of air-sea CO2 disequilibrium and the ventilation age mixing bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberGB3014
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How accurate is the estimation of anthropogenic carbon in the ocean? An evaluation of the ΔC* method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this