Abstract
Questions the research procedures reported in R. Genthner's (1974) article, "Evaluating the Functioning of Community-based Hotlines," stating that the procedures suggest crucial ethical issues that must be discussed. Informed consent, client follow-up, normative paradigms of research, the hotline culture, and the language used in Genthner's article are examined. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 236-239 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Professional Psychology: Research and Practice |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 1976 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- ethical issues in evaluation of community-based hotlines, criticism of R. Genthner's research procedures
Cite this
Hotline research : Critique, response, and rejoiner. / Baizerman, Michael L.
In: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.05.1976, p. 236-239.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hotline research
T2 - Critique, response, and rejoiner
AU - Baizerman, Michael L.
PY - 1976/5/1
Y1 - 1976/5/1
N2 - Questions the research procedures reported in R. Genthner's (1974) article, "Evaluating the Functioning of Community-based Hotlines," stating that the procedures suggest crucial ethical issues that must be discussed. Informed consent, client follow-up, normative paradigms of research, the hotline culture, and the language used in Genthner's article are examined. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
AB - Questions the research procedures reported in R. Genthner's (1974) article, "Evaluating the Functioning of Community-based Hotlines," stating that the procedures suggest crucial ethical issues that must be discussed. Informed consent, client follow-up, normative paradigms of research, the hotline culture, and the language used in Genthner's article are examined. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
KW - ethical issues in evaluation of community-based hotlines, criticism of R. Genthner's research procedures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350338686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350338686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0735-7028.7.2.236
DO - 10.1037/0735-7028.7.2.236
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:70350338686
VL - 7
SP - 236
EP - 239
JO - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
JF - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
SN - 0735-7028
IS - 2
ER -