TY - JOUR
T1 - Hip fracture care during the COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - Retrospective cohort and literature review
AU - Topor, Lauren
AU - Wood, Lily
AU - Switzer, Julie A.
AU - Schroder, Lisa K.
AU - Onizuka, Naoko
PY - 2022/3/22
Y1 - 2022/3/22
N2 - Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic has affected hip fracture care at a Level I Trauma hospital. The secondary goal was to summarize the published hip fracture reports during the pandemic. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Level I Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: Eighty-six operatively treated hip fracture patients age ≥65 years, occurring from January 17 to July 2, 2020. Intervention (if any): N/A. Main Outcome Measurements: We defined 3 phases of healthcare system response: pre-COVID-19 (period A), acute phase (period B), and subacute phase (period C). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Clinical outcomes including time to surgery (TTS) and length of stay (LOS) were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results: Twenty-seven patients from Period A, 27 patients from Period B, and 32 patients from Period C were included. The 30-day mortality was not statistically different. The mean TTS was 20.0 +/- 14.3 hours and was the longest in Period C (22.1 +/- 9.8 hours), but the difference was not statistically significant. The mean LOS was 113.0 +/- 66.2 hours and was longest in Period B (120.9 +/- 100.6 hours). However, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The 30-day mortality, TTS, and LOS were not statistically different across multiple phases of pandemic at a level 1 trauma center. Our results suggest that we successfully adapted new protocol changes and continued to provide evidence-based care for hip fracture patients. Our results were comparable with that of other authors around the world.
AB - Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic has affected hip fracture care at a Level I Trauma hospital. The secondary goal was to summarize the published hip fracture reports during the pandemic. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Level I Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: Eighty-six operatively treated hip fracture patients age ≥65 years, occurring from January 17 to July 2, 2020. Intervention (if any): N/A. Main Outcome Measurements: We defined 3 phases of healthcare system response: pre-COVID-19 (period A), acute phase (period B), and subacute phase (period C). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Clinical outcomes including time to surgery (TTS) and length of stay (LOS) were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results: Twenty-seven patients from Period A, 27 patients from Period B, and 32 patients from Period C were included. The 30-day mortality was not statistically different. The mean TTS was 20.0 +/- 14.3 hours and was the longest in Period C (22.1 +/- 9.8 hours), but the difference was not statistically significant. The mean LOS was 113.0 +/- 66.2 hours and was longest in Period B (120.9 +/- 100.6 hours). However, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The 30-day mortality, TTS, and LOS were not statistically different across multiple phases of pandemic at a level 1 trauma center. Our results suggest that we successfully adapted new protocol changes and continued to provide evidence-based care for hip fracture patients. Our results were comparable with that of other authors around the world.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Hip fracture
KW - Length of stay
KW - Time to surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85158838643
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85158838643#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000165
DO - 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000165
M3 - Article
C2 - 34964041
SN - 2574-2167
VL - 5
SP - E165
JO - OTA International: The Open Access Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
JF - OTA International: The Open Access Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
IS - 1
ER -