Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

High-flow nasal cannula for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: systematic reviews of effectiveness and its risks of aerosolization, dispersion, and infection transmission

  • Arnav Agarwal
  • , John Basmaji
  • , Fiona Muttalib
  • , David Granton
  • , Dipayan Chaudhuri
  • , Devin Chetan
  • , Malini Hu
  • , Shannon M. Fernando
  • , Kimia Honarmand
  • , Layla Bakaa
  • , Sonia Brar
  • , Bram Rochwerg
  • , Neill K. Adhikari
  • , Francois Lamontagne
  • , Srinivas Murthy
  • , David S.C. Hui
  • , Charles Gomersall
  • , Samira Mubareka
  • , Janet V. Diaz
  • , Karen E.A. Burns
  • Rachel Couban, Quazi Ibrahim, Gordon H. Guyatt, Per O. Vandvik

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: We conducted two World Health Organization-commissioned reviews to inform use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). We synthesized the evidence regarding efficacy and safety (review 1), as well as risks of droplet dispersion, aerosol generation, and associated transmission (review 2) of viral products. Source: Literature searches were performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese databases, and medRxiv. Review 1: we synthesized results from randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HFNC to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in critically ill patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Review 2: we narratively summarized findings from studies evaluating droplet dispersion, aerosol generation, or infection transmission associated with HFNC. For both reviews, paired reviewers independently conducted screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. We evaluated certainty of evidence using GRADE methodology. Principal findings: No eligible studies included COVID-19 patients. Review 1: 12 RCTs (n = 1,989 patients) provided low-certainty evidence that HFNC may reduce invasive ventilation (relative risk [RR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.99) and escalation of oxygen therapy (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.98) in patients with respiratory failure. Results provided no support for differences in mortality (moderate certainty), or in-hospital or intensive care length of stay (moderate and low certainty, respectively). Review 2: four studies evaluating droplet dispersion and three evaluating aerosol generation and dispersion provided very low certainty evidence. Two simulation studies and a crossover study showed mixed findings regarding the effect of HFNC on droplet dispersion. Although two simulation studies reported no associated increase in aerosol dispersion, one reported that higher flow rates were associated with increased regions of aerosol density. Conclusions: High-flow nasal cannula may reduce the need for invasive ventilation and escalation of therapy compared with COT in COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. This benefit must be balanced against the unknown risk of airborne transmission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1217-1248
Number of pages32
JournalCanadian Journal of Anesthesia
Volume67
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • aerosols
  • high-flow nasal cannula
  • respiratory failure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High-flow nasal cannula for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: systematic reviews of effectiveness and its risks of aerosolization, dispersion, and infection transmission'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this