Heterogeneity of the Predictive Polygenic Risk Scores for Coronary Heart Disease Age-at-Onset in Three Different Coronary Heart Disease Family-Based Ascertainments

Mary F. Feitosa, Allison L. Kuipers, Mary K. Wojczynski, Lihua Wang, Emma Barinas-Mitchell, Alexander M. Kulminski, Bharat Thyagarajan, Joseph H. Lee, Thomas Perls, Kaare Christensen, Anne B. Newman, Joseph M. Zmuda, Michael A. Province

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)


BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for coronary heart disease (CHD) may contribute to assess the overall risk of CHD. We evaluated how PRS may influence CHD risk when the distribution of age-at-onset, sex, and family health history differ significantly.

METHODS: Our study included 3 family-based ascertainments: LLFS (Long Life Family Study, N Individuals=4572), which represents a low CHD risk, and Family Heart Study, which consists of randomly selected families (FamHS-random, N Individuals=1806), and high CHD risk families (FamHS-high risk, N Individuals=2301). We examined the effects of PRS, sex, family ascertainment, PRS interaction with sex (PRS*sex) and with family ascertainment (PRS*LLFS and PRS*FamHS-high risk) on CHD, corrected for traditional cardiovascular risk factors using Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS: Healthy-aging LLFS presented ≈17 years delayed for CHD age-at-onset compared with FamHS-high risk ( P<1.0×10 -4). Sex-specific association ( P<1.0×10 -17) and PRS*sex ( P=2.7×10 -3) predicted prevalent CHD. CHD age-at-onset was associated with PRS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.57; P=1.3×10 -5), LLFS (HR, 0.54; P=2.6×10 -5), and FamHS-high risk (HR, 2.86; P=6.70x10 -15) in men, and with PRS (HR, 1.76; P=7.70×10 -3), FamHS-high risk (HR, 4.88; P=8.70×10 -10), and PRS×FamHS-high risk (HR, 0.61; P=3.60×10 -2) in women. In the PRS extreme quartile distributions, CHD age-at-onset was associated ( P<0.05) with PRS, FamHS-high risk, and PRS interactions with both low and high CHD risk families for women. For men, the PRS quartile results remained similar to the whole distribution.

CONCLUSIONS: Differences in CHD family-based ascertainments show evidence of PRS interacting with sex to predict CHD risk. In women, CHD age-at-onset was associated with PRS, CHD family history, and interactions of PRS with family history. In men, PRS and CHD family history were the major effects on the CHD age-at-onset. Understanding the heterogeneity of risks associated with CHD end points at both the personal and familial levels may shed light on the underlying genetic effects influencing CHD and lead to more personalized risk prediction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E003201
JournalCirculation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 1 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Institute on Aging grants U01AG023746, U01AG023712, U01AG023749, U01AG023755, U01AG023744, and U19AG063893 for LLFS (Long Life Family Study), and grants National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases R01-DK-089256 and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01HL117078 for FamHS (Family Heart Study).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.


  • aging
  • cardiovascular diseases
  • coronary artery disease
  • risk factors


Dive into the research topics of 'Heterogeneity of the Predictive Polygenic Risk Scores for Coronary Heart Disease Age-at-Onset in Three Different Coronary Heart Disease Family-Based Ascertainments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this