Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Heterogeneity of study endpoints in stereotactic body radiation therapy studies for bone metastases: A systematic review

  • Shing Fung Lee
  • , Henry C.Y. Wong
  • , Eva Oldenburger
  • , Srinivas Raman
  • , Gustavo N. Marta
  • , Adrian W. Chan
  • , Dirk Rades
  • , Yvette M. Van Der Linden
  • , Joanne M. Van Der Velden
  • , Quynh Nhu Nguyen
  • , J. Isabelle Choi
  • , Caroline Hircock
  • , Chiara Doccioli
  • , Claudia Cosma
  • , Saverio Caini
  • , Agata Rembielak
  • , Vassilios Vassiliou
  • , Pierluigi Bonomo
  • , Peter A.S. Johnstone
  • , Sara Alcorn
  • Candice Johnstone, Charles B. Simone, Peter J. Hoskin, Edward Chow, Samuel Ryu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review evaluated variability in study endpoints among stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) studies for bone metastases. Heterogeneity in endpoint definitions and reporting may hinder cross-study comparability and the establishment of consistent treatment protocols. Methods: A comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials identified prospective studies, including cohort studies, phase I/II trials, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs), published between 2014-01-01 and 2024-11-12. Studies were eligible if they: (1) included adult patients with bone metastases treated with SBRT, (2) were prospective, and (3) reported pre-defined clinical endpoints. Results: A total of 58 studies were included: eight cohort studies, 37 phase I/II trials, and 13 RCTs. Pain-related endpoints were the most frequently reported primary endpoints, with pain response reported in 28% (16 studies). Other primary endpoints included toxicities (22%, 13 studies), survival metrics (12%, seven studies), and local control (9%, five studies). Secondary endpoints varied, with survival-related endpoints reported in 60% (35 studies) and toxicity in 41% (24 studies). Endpoint selection differed by clinical scenario, reflecting distinct objectives such as symptom relief, local control, and progression-free survival. Variability in definitions for endpoints, particularly pain flare and vertebral compression fracture, along with inconsistent radiological response criteria, was noted. Conclusion: Considerable heterogeneity in endpoint selection, definitions, and measurement tools across SBRT reflects diverse clinical objectives. Consensus-driven standardisation of endpoints, response criteria, and follow-up schedules is essential to enhance comparability, facilitate evidence synthesis, and support integration of SBRT research findings into clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-285
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Radiosurgery and SBRT
Volume9
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Old City Publishing, Inc.

Keywords

  • bone metastases
  • oligometastatic disease
  • primary endpoints
  • prospective trials
  • stereotactic body radiation therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heterogeneity of study endpoints in stereotactic body radiation therapy studies for bone metastases: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this