Abstract
The presence of blood in the urine is a significant finding that calls for prompt evaluation. Gross hematuria usually indicates a serious problem; its correlation with malignancy - typically a transitional cell carcinoma - is fairly high. Microscopically detectable blood is less likely to signal a major underlying condition; a finding of 0 to 3 red cells per high-power field is probably innocent. The work-up for gross and microscopic hematuria focuses on disturbances of urinary tract function and includes a history and physical examination, urinalysis, intravenous pyelography, urine cytology, and cystoscopy. The presence of hematuria, proteinuria, and renal insufficiency warrants referral to a nephrologist. A search for the cause of microscopic hematuria is more likely to create an iatrogenic problem than to uncover a life-threatening condition; if the hematuria persists, repeat the urinalysis and cytology every 6 months until the problem resolves or 3 years have passed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2235-2242 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Consultant |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| State | Published - Aug 1999 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Hematuria: Just UTI - Or something more ominous?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS