Hedge commitments and agency costs of debt: Evidence from interest rate protection covenants and accounting conservatism

Anne Beatty, Reining Petacchi, Haiwen Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

We provide large sample evidence that credible hedge commitments reduce the agency costs of debt and that accounting conservatism enhances hedge commitments. We examine 2,338 bank loans entered into by 263 mandatory derivative users that are contractually obligated by interest rate protection covenants, 709 voluntary derivative users, and 1,366 non-users. We show that loan contracts are more likely to include interest rate protection covenants when borrowers are less likely to maintain the hedge position once the financing is completed. We find that borrowers who credibly commit to hedge using these covenants significantly reduce their interest rates. While we do not find an average interest savings for voluntary derivative users, we do find a reduction in their loan rates when they practice conservative financial reporting. Our results suggest that accounting conservatism helps borrowers resolve shareholder-creditor conflicts by committing to maintain their hedge positions after completing debt financing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)700-738
Number of pages39
JournalReview of Accounting Studies
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Accounting conservatism
  • Agency costs of debt
  • Hedge commitments
  • Interest rate protection

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hedge commitments and agency costs of debt: Evidence from interest rate protection covenants and accounting conservatism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this