Health Care Provider Adherence to Surgical Guidelines for Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy

Annelise M. Wilhite, Makinna C. Oestreich, Megan Olson, Sabrina M. Bedell, Danielle Westenberg, Ananta Bangdiwala, Salman Ikramuddin, Monica Sanchez-Avila, Robert D. Madoff, Mahmoud A. Khalifa, Britt K. Erickson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health care provider adherence to the surgical protocol endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and compare adherence between gynecologic oncologists and obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, women were included if they had a pathogenic BRCA mutation and underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2017. Adherence was defined as completing all of the following: collection of washings, complete resection of the fallopian tube, and performing the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated End (SEE-FIM) pathologic protocol. RESULTS: Of 290 patients who met inclusion criteria, 160 patients were treated by 18 gynecologic oncologists and 130 patients by 75 ob-gyns. Surgery was performed at 10 different hospitals throughout a single metropolitan area. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 199 cases (69%) were adherent to the surgical protocol. Gynecologic oncologists were more than twice as likely to fully adhere to the full surgical protocol as ob-gyns (91% vs 41%, P<.01). Specifically, gynecologic oncologists were more likely to resect the entire tube (99% vs 95%, P=.03), to have followed the SEE-FIM protocol (98% vs 82%, P<.01), and collect washings (94% vs 49%, P<.01). Complication rates did not differ between groups. Occult neoplasia was diagnosed in 11 patients (3.8%). The incidence of occult neoplasia was 6.3% in gynecologic oncology patients and 0.8% in obstetrics and gynecology patients (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Despite clear surgical guidelines, only two thirds of all health care providers were fully adherent to guidelines. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to follow surgical guidelines compared with general ob-gyns and more likely to diagnose occult neoplasia despite similar patient populations. Rates of risk-reducing surgery will likely continue to increase as genetic testing becomes more widespread, highlighting the importance of health care provider education for this procedure. Centralized care or referral to subspecialists for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may be warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)520-526
Number of pages7
JournalObstetrics and gynecology
Volume134
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Ovariectomy
Health Personnel
Guidelines
Neoplasms
Fallopian Tubes
Genetic Testing
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Cohort Studies
Referral and Consultation
Retrospective Studies
Demography
Oncologists
Education
Mutation
Incidence
Population

Cite this

Health Care Provider Adherence to Surgical Guidelines for Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy. / Wilhite, Annelise M.; Oestreich, Makinna C.; Olson, Megan; Bedell, Sabrina M.; Westenberg, Danielle; Bangdiwala, Ananta; Ikramuddin, Salman; Sanchez-Avila, Monica; Madoff, Robert D.; Khalifa, Mahmoud A.; Erickson, Britt K.

In: Obstetrics and gynecology, Vol. 134, No. 3, 01.09.2019, p. 520-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilhite, Annelise M. ; Oestreich, Makinna C. ; Olson, Megan ; Bedell, Sabrina M. ; Westenberg, Danielle ; Bangdiwala, Ananta ; Ikramuddin, Salman ; Sanchez-Avila, Monica ; Madoff, Robert D. ; Khalifa, Mahmoud A. ; Erickson, Britt K. / Health Care Provider Adherence to Surgical Guidelines for Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy. In: Obstetrics and gynecology. 2019 ; Vol. 134, No. 3. pp. 520-526.
@article{67dc488454d3425fa7c3eaf77766edb0,
title = "Health Care Provider Adherence to Surgical Guidelines for Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health care provider adherence to the surgical protocol endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and compare adherence between gynecologic oncologists and obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, women were included if they had a pathogenic BRCA mutation and underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2017. Adherence was defined as completing all of the following: collection of washings, complete resection of the fallopian tube, and performing the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated End (SEE-FIM) pathologic protocol. RESULTS: Of 290 patients who met inclusion criteria, 160 patients were treated by 18 gynecologic oncologists and 130 patients by 75 ob-gyns. Surgery was performed at 10 different hospitals throughout a single metropolitan area. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 199 cases (69{\%}) were adherent to the surgical protocol. Gynecologic oncologists were more than twice as likely to fully adhere to the full surgical protocol as ob-gyns (91{\%} vs 41{\%}, P<.01). Specifically, gynecologic oncologists were more likely to resect the entire tube (99{\%} vs 95{\%}, P=.03), to have followed the SEE-FIM protocol (98{\%} vs 82{\%}, P<.01), and collect washings (94{\%} vs 49{\%}, P<.01). Complication rates did not differ between groups. Occult neoplasia was diagnosed in 11 patients (3.8{\%}). The incidence of occult neoplasia was 6.3{\%} in gynecologic oncology patients and 0.8{\%} in obstetrics and gynecology patients (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Despite clear surgical guidelines, only two thirds of all health care providers were fully adherent to guidelines. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to follow surgical guidelines compared with general ob-gyns and more likely to diagnose occult neoplasia despite similar patient populations. Rates of risk-reducing surgery will likely continue to increase as genetic testing becomes more widespread, highlighting the importance of health care provider education for this procedure. Centralized care or referral to subspecialists for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may be warranted.",
author = "Wilhite, {Annelise M.} and Oestreich, {Makinna C.} and Megan Olson and Bedell, {Sabrina M.} and Danielle Westenberg and Ananta Bangdiwala and Salman Ikramuddin and Monica Sanchez-Avila and Madoff, {Robert D.} and Khalifa, {Mahmoud A.} and Erickson, {Britt K.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0000000000003421",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "520--526",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health Care Provider Adherence to Surgical Guidelines for Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy

AU - Wilhite, Annelise M.

AU - Oestreich, Makinna C.

AU - Olson, Megan

AU - Bedell, Sabrina M.

AU - Westenberg, Danielle

AU - Bangdiwala, Ananta

AU - Ikramuddin, Salman

AU - Sanchez-Avila, Monica

AU - Madoff, Robert D.

AU - Khalifa, Mahmoud A.

AU - Erickson, Britt K.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health care provider adherence to the surgical protocol endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and compare adherence between gynecologic oncologists and obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, women were included if they had a pathogenic BRCA mutation and underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2017. Adherence was defined as completing all of the following: collection of washings, complete resection of the fallopian tube, and performing the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated End (SEE-FIM) pathologic protocol. RESULTS: Of 290 patients who met inclusion criteria, 160 patients were treated by 18 gynecologic oncologists and 130 patients by 75 ob-gyns. Surgery was performed at 10 different hospitals throughout a single metropolitan area. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 199 cases (69%) were adherent to the surgical protocol. Gynecologic oncologists were more than twice as likely to fully adhere to the full surgical protocol as ob-gyns (91% vs 41%, P<.01). Specifically, gynecologic oncologists were more likely to resect the entire tube (99% vs 95%, P=.03), to have followed the SEE-FIM protocol (98% vs 82%, P<.01), and collect washings (94% vs 49%, P<.01). Complication rates did not differ between groups. Occult neoplasia was diagnosed in 11 patients (3.8%). The incidence of occult neoplasia was 6.3% in gynecologic oncology patients and 0.8% in obstetrics and gynecology patients (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Despite clear surgical guidelines, only two thirds of all health care providers were fully adherent to guidelines. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to follow surgical guidelines compared with general ob-gyns and more likely to diagnose occult neoplasia despite similar patient populations. Rates of risk-reducing surgery will likely continue to increase as genetic testing becomes more widespread, highlighting the importance of health care provider education for this procedure. Centralized care or referral to subspecialists for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may be warranted.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health care provider adherence to the surgical protocol endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and compare adherence between gynecologic oncologists and obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, women were included if they had a pathogenic BRCA mutation and underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2017. Adherence was defined as completing all of the following: collection of washings, complete resection of the fallopian tube, and performing the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated End (SEE-FIM) pathologic protocol. RESULTS: Of 290 patients who met inclusion criteria, 160 patients were treated by 18 gynecologic oncologists and 130 patients by 75 ob-gyns. Surgery was performed at 10 different hospitals throughout a single metropolitan area. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 199 cases (69%) were adherent to the surgical protocol. Gynecologic oncologists were more than twice as likely to fully adhere to the full surgical protocol as ob-gyns (91% vs 41%, P<.01). Specifically, gynecologic oncologists were more likely to resect the entire tube (99% vs 95%, P=.03), to have followed the SEE-FIM protocol (98% vs 82%, P<.01), and collect washings (94% vs 49%, P<.01). Complication rates did not differ between groups. Occult neoplasia was diagnosed in 11 patients (3.8%). The incidence of occult neoplasia was 6.3% in gynecologic oncology patients and 0.8% in obstetrics and gynecology patients (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Despite clear surgical guidelines, only two thirds of all health care providers were fully adherent to guidelines. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to follow surgical guidelines compared with general ob-gyns and more likely to diagnose occult neoplasia despite similar patient populations. Rates of risk-reducing surgery will likely continue to increase as genetic testing becomes more widespread, highlighting the importance of health care provider education for this procedure. Centralized care or referral to subspecialists for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may be warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071709800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071709800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003421

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003421

M3 - Article

C2 - 31403600

AN - SCOPUS:85071709800

VL - 134

SP - 520

EP - 526

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 3

ER -