Groundwater nitrate contamination costs: A survey of private well owners

Ann M Lewandowski, B. R. Montgomery, Carl J Rosen, J. F. Moncrief

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Groundwater is an important source of drinking water in Minnesota and nationwide. In Minnesota, 5% to 10% of drinking water wells have nitrate (NO3) concentrations that exceed health standards. Well owners incur direct costs associated with the presence of NO3, including costs related to treatment systems, well replacement, and purchasing of bottled water. The objective of this study was to quantify actual amounts spent by private well owners when NO3 levels are elevated, regardless of whether the owners are aware of the contamination. Survey questionnaires asking about well characteristics, NO3 testing, and costs of actions taken in response to elevated NO3 were mailed to 800 private well owners in the central sand plains of Minnesota. Sixty percent of recipients returned surveys and then were sent water sampling bottles, of which 77% were returned. Nitrate was determined in the returned water samples. About 6% of wells tested greater than the US Environmental Protection Agency health standard maximum of 10 mg L -1 (10 ppm) nitrate-nitrogen. Less than one-third of respondents had tested their water for NO3 within the past three years. Average remediation costs were $190 y-1 to buy bottled water, $800 to buy a NO3 removal system plus $100 y -1 for maintenance, and $7,200 to install a new well. Of well owners with nitrate-nitrogen over 10 mg L-1, 24% bought bottled water, 21% installed treatment systems, 24% installed new wells, and 31% were unaware of the contamination and took no actions. Water resource planners can compare the costs described in this study to the costs of preventing aquifer contamination through education and technical and financial support. This study also demonstrates a method for representative sampling of private wells without on-site visits, and the continued need for educational programs related to routine testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-161
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Soil and Water Conservation
Volume63
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Fingerprint

groundwater
nitrates
bottled water
nitrate
well
cost
nitrate nitrogen
water
drinking water
United States Environmental Protection Agency
nitrogen
questionnaire survey
sampling
purchasing
remediation
education programs
bottles
funding
water resources
aquifers

Keywords

  • Bottled water
  • Drinking water
  • Groundwater quality
  • Nitrate test kit
  • Sand plains
  • Sandy outwash

Cite this

Groundwater nitrate contamination costs : A survey of private well owners. / Lewandowski, Ann M; Montgomery, B. R.; Rosen, Carl J; Moncrief, J. F.

In: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 63, No. 3, 01.05.2008, p. 153-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{b21434f3ff8f4f6db0cfbf584fec8f00,
title = "Groundwater nitrate contamination costs: A survey of private well owners",
abstract = "Groundwater is an important source of drinking water in Minnesota and nationwide. In Minnesota, 5{\%} to 10{\%} of drinking water wells have nitrate (NO3) concentrations that exceed health standards. Well owners incur direct costs associated with the presence of NO3, including costs related to treatment systems, well replacement, and purchasing of bottled water. The objective of this study was to quantify actual amounts spent by private well owners when NO3 levels are elevated, regardless of whether the owners are aware of the contamination. Survey questionnaires asking about well characteristics, NO3 testing, and costs of actions taken in response to elevated NO3 were mailed to 800 private well owners in the central sand plains of Minnesota. Sixty percent of recipients returned surveys and then were sent water sampling bottles, of which 77{\%} were returned. Nitrate was determined in the returned water samples. About 6{\%} of wells tested greater than the US Environmental Protection Agency health standard maximum of 10 mg L -1 (10 ppm) nitrate-nitrogen. Less than one-third of respondents had tested their water for NO3 within the past three years. Average remediation costs were $190 y-1 to buy bottled water, $800 to buy a NO3 removal system plus $100 y -1 for maintenance, and $7,200 to install a new well. Of well owners with nitrate-nitrogen over 10 mg L-1, 24{\%} bought bottled water, 21{\%} installed treatment systems, 24{\%} installed new wells, and 31{\%} were unaware of the contamination and took no actions. Water resource planners can compare the costs described in this study to the costs of preventing aquifer contamination through education and technical and financial support. This study also demonstrates a method for representative sampling of private wells without on-site visits, and the continued need for educational programs related to routine testing.",
keywords = "Bottled water, Drinking water, Groundwater quality, Nitrate test kit, Sand plains, Sandy outwash",
author = "Lewandowski, {Ann M} and Montgomery, {B. R.} and Rosen, {Carl J} and Moncrief, {J. F.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "153--161",
journal = "Journal of Soils and Water Conservation",
issn = "0022-4561",
publisher = "Soil Conservation Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Groundwater nitrate contamination costs

T2 - A survey of private well owners

AU - Lewandowski, Ann M

AU - Montgomery, B. R.

AU - Rosen, Carl J

AU - Moncrief, J. F.

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - Groundwater is an important source of drinking water in Minnesota and nationwide. In Minnesota, 5% to 10% of drinking water wells have nitrate (NO3) concentrations that exceed health standards. Well owners incur direct costs associated with the presence of NO3, including costs related to treatment systems, well replacement, and purchasing of bottled water. The objective of this study was to quantify actual amounts spent by private well owners when NO3 levels are elevated, regardless of whether the owners are aware of the contamination. Survey questionnaires asking about well characteristics, NO3 testing, and costs of actions taken in response to elevated NO3 were mailed to 800 private well owners in the central sand plains of Minnesota. Sixty percent of recipients returned surveys and then were sent water sampling bottles, of which 77% were returned. Nitrate was determined in the returned water samples. About 6% of wells tested greater than the US Environmental Protection Agency health standard maximum of 10 mg L -1 (10 ppm) nitrate-nitrogen. Less than one-third of respondents had tested their water for NO3 within the past three years. Average remediation costs were $190 y-1 to buy bottled water, $800 to buy a NO3 removal system plus $100 y -1 for maintenance, and $7,200 to install a new well. Of well owners with nitrate-nitrogen over 10 mg L-1, 24% bought bottled water, 21% installed treatment systems, 24% installed new wells, and 31% were unaware of the contamination and took no actions. Water resource planners can compare the costs described in this study to the costs of preventing aquifer contamination through education and technical and financial support. This study also demonstrates a method for representative sampling of private wells without on-site visits, and the continued need for educational programs related to routine testing.

AB - Groundwater is an important source of drinking water in Minnesota and nationwide. In Minnesota, 5% to 10% of drinking water wells have nitrate (NO3) concentrations that exceed health standards. Well owners incur direct costs associated with the presence of NO3, including costs related to treatment systems, well replacement, and purchasing of bottled water. The objective of this study was to quantify actual amounts spent by private well owners when NO3 levels are elevated, regardless of whether the owners are aware of the contamination. Survey questionnaires asking about well characteristics, NO3 testing, and costs of actions taken in response to elevated NO3 were mailed to 800 private well owners in the central sand plains of Minnesota. Sixty percent of recipients returned surveys and then were sent water sampling bottles, of which 77% were returned. Nitrate was determined in the returned water samples. About 6% of wells tested greater than the US Environmental Protection Agency health standard maximum of 10 mg L -1 (10 ppm) nitrate-nitrogen. Less than one-third of respondents had tested their water for NO3 within the past three years. Average remediation costs were $190 y-1 to buy bottled water, $800 to buy a NO3 removal system plus $100 y -1 for maintenance, and $7,200 to install a new well. Of well owners with nitrate-nitrogen over 10 mg L-1, 24% bought bottled water, 21% installed treatment systems, 24% installed new wells, and 31% were unaware of the contamination and took no actions. Water resource planners can compare the costs described in this study to the costs of preventing aquifer contamination through education and technical and financial support. This study also demonstrates a method for representative sampling of private wells without on-site visits, and the continued need for educational programs related to routine testing.

KW - Bottled water

KW - Drinking water

KW - Groundwater quality

KW - Nitrate test kit

KW - Sand plains

KW - Sandy outwash

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57149120164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57149120164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:57149120164

VL - 63

SP - 153

EP - 161

JO - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

JF - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

SN - 0022-4561

IS - 3

ER -