Greenhouse gas emissions from key infrastructure sectors in larger and smaller Chinese cities: method development and benchmarking

Kangkang Tong, Andrew Fang, Dana Boyer, Yuanchao Hu, Shenghui Cui, Lei Shi, Yuliya Kalmykova, Anu Ramaswami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With massive urbanization and infrastructure investments occurring in China, understanding GHG emissions from infrastructure use in small and large Chinese cities with different administrative levels is important for building future low-carbon cities. This paper identifies diverse data sources to assess GHG emission from community-wide infrastructure footprints (CIF) in four Chinese cities of varying population (1 to 20 million people) and administrative levels: Yixing, Qinhuangdao, Xiamen and Beijing. CIF addresses seven infrastructure sectors providing energy (fuels/coal), electricity, water supply and wastewater treatment, transportation, municipal waste management, construction materials, and food to support urban activities. Industrial energy use dominates the infrastructure GHG CIF in all four cities, ranging from 76% of total CIF in Yixing to 30% in Beijing, followed by residential energy use (6–13%), transportation (4–12%), commercial energy use (2–25%), food (6–11%), cement use (3–8%) and water (about 1%), thereby identifying priorities for low-carbon infrastructure development. Trans-boundary footprint contributions ranged from 31% (Beijing) to 8% (Qinhuangdao), indicating that supply chains to cities are important. GHGs from energy use are dominated by electricity (35–45%) and non-electricity coal use (30–50%). The authors demonstrate that disaggregated infrastructure use-efficiency metrics in each infrastructure sector provide useful baseline performance data for comparing diverse cities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-239
Number of pages213
JournalCarbon Management
Volume7
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 3 2016

Fingerprint

benchmarking
greenhouse gas
infrastructure
footprint
energy use
electricity
city
method
residential energy
coal
food
carbon
waste management
urbanization
cement
water supply

Keywords

  • Chinese city
  • GHG emission
  • benchmark
  • infrastructure sector

Cite this

Greenhouse gas emissions from key infrastructure sectors in larger and smaller Chinese cities : method development and benchmarking. / Tong, Kangkang; Fang, Andrew; Boyer, Dana; Hu, Yuanchao; Cui, Shenghui; Shi, Lei; Kalmykova, Yuliya; Ramaswami, Anu.

In: Carbon Management, Vol. 7, No. 1-2, 03.03.2016, p. 27-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tong, Kangkang ; Fang, Andrew ; Boyer, Dana ; Hu, Yuanchao ; Cui, Shenghui ; Shi, Lei ; Kalmykova, Yuliya ; Ramaswami, Anu. / Greenhouse gas emissions from key infrastructure sectors in larger and smaller Chinese cities : method development and benchmarking. In: Carbon Management. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 1-2. pp. 27-239.
@article{5571d1f71972429dabaa7db27a3770b0,
title = "Greenhouse gas emissions from key infrastructure sectors in larger and smaller Chinese cities: method development and benchmarking",
abstract = "With massive urbanization and infrastructure investments occurring in China, understanding GHG emissions from infrastructure use in small and large Chinese cities with different administrative levels is important for building future low-carbon cities. This paper identifies diverse data sources to assess GHG emission from community-wide infrastructure footprints (CIF) in four Chinese cities of varying population (1 to 20 million people) and administrative levels: Yixing, Qinhuangdao, Xiamen and Beijing. CIF addresses seven infrastructure sectors providing energy (fuels/coal), electricity, water supply and wastewater treatment, transportation, municipal waste management, construction materials, and food to support urban activities. Industrial energy use dominates the infrastructure GHG CIF in all four cities, ranging from 76{\%} of total CIF in Yixing to 30{\%} in Beijing, followed by residential energy use (6–13{\%}), transportation (4–12{\%}), commercial energy use (2–25{\%}), food (6–11{\%}), cement use (3–8{\%}) and water (about 1{\%}), thereby identifying priorities for low-carbon infrastructure development. Trans-boundary footprint contributions ranged from 31{\%} (Beijing) to 8{\%} (Qinhuangdao), indicating that supply chains to cities are important. GHGs from energy use are dominated by electricity (35–45{\%}) and non-electricity coal use (30–50{\%}). The authors demonstrate that disaggregated infrastructure use-efficiency metrics in each infrastructure sector provide useful baseline performance data for comparing diverse cities.",
keywords = "Chinese city, GHG emission, benchmark, infrastructure sector",
author = "Kangkang Tong and Andrew Fang and Dana Boyer and Yuanchao Hu and Shenghui Cui and Lei Shi and Yuliya Kalmykova and Anu Ramaswami",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/17583004.2016.1165354",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "27--239",
journal = "Carbon Management",
issn = "1758-3004",
publisher = "Future Science",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greenhouse gas emissions from key infrastructure sectors in larger and smaller Chinese cities

T2 - method development and benchmarking

AU - Tong, Kangkang

AU - Fang, Andrew

AU - Boyer, Dana

AU - Hu, Yuanchao

AU - Cui, Shenghui

AU - Shi, Lei

AU - Kalmykova, Yuliya

AU - Ramaswami, Anu

PY - 2016/3/3

Y1 - 2016/3/3

N2 - With massive urbanization and infrastructure investments occurring in China, understanding GHG emissions from infrastructure use in small and large Chinese cities with different administrative levels is important for building future low-carbon cities. This paper identifies diverse data sources to assess GHG emission from community-wide infrastructure footprints (CIF) in four Chinese cities of varying population (1 to 20 million people) and administrative levels: Yixing, Qinhuangdao, Xiamen and Beijing. CIF addresses seven infrastructure sectors providing energy (fuels/coal), electricity, water supply and wastewater treatment, transportation, municipal waste management, construction materials, and food to support urban activities. Industrial energy use dominates the infrastructure GHG CIF in all four cities, ranging from 76% of total CIF in Yixing to 30% in Beijing, followed by residential energy use (6–13%), transportation (4–12%), commercial energy use (2–25%), food (6–11%), cement use (3–8%) and water (about 1%), thereby identifying priorities for low-carbon infrastructure development. Trans-boundary footprint contributions ranged from 31% (Beijing) to 8% (Qinhuangdao), indicating that supply chains to cities are important. GHGs from energy use are dominated by electricity (35–45%) and non-electricity coal use (30–50%). The authors demonstrate that disaggregated infrastructure use-efficiency metrics in each infrastructure sector provide useful baseline performance data for comparing diverse cities.

AB - With massive urbanization and infrastructure investments occurring in China, understanding GHG emissions from infrastructure use in small and large Chinese cities with different administrative levels is important for building future low-carbon cities. This paper identifies diverse data sources to assess GHG emission from community-wide infrastructure footprints (CIF) in four Chinese cities of varying population (1 to 20 million people) and administrative levels: Yixing, Qinhuangdao, Xiamen and Beijing. CIF addresses seven infrastructure sectors providing energy (fuels/coal), electricity, water supply and wastewater treatment, transportation, municipal waste management, construction materials, and food to support urban activities. Industrial energy use dominates the infrastructure GHG CIF in all four cities, ranging from 76% of total CIF in Yixing to 30% in Beijing, followed by residential energy use (6–13%), transportation (4–12%), commercial energy use (2–25%), food (6–11%), cement use (3–8%) and water (about 1%), thereby identifying priorities for low-carbon infrastructure development. Trans-boundary footprint contributions ranged from 31% (Beijing) to 8% (Qinhuangdao), indicating that supply chains to cities are important. GHGs from energy use are dominated by electricity (35–45%) and non-electricity coal use (30–50%). The authors demonstrate that disaggregated infrastructure use-efficiency metrics in each infrastructure sector provide useful baseline performance data for comparing diverse cities.

KW - Chinese city

KW - GHG emission

KW - benchmark

KW - infrastructure sector

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978722148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978722148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17583004.2016.1165354

DO - 10.1080/17583004.2016.1165354

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84978722148

VL - 7

SP - 27

EP - 239

JO - Carbon Management

JF - Carbon Management

SN - 1758-3004

IS - 1-2

ER -