Graphic health warnings as activators of social networks

A field experiment among individuals of low socioeconomic position

Shoba Ramanadhan, Rebekah H Nagler, Rachel McCloud, Racquel Kohler, Kasisomayajula Viswanath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale Graphic health warnings (GHWs) on cigarette packages present an important tobacco control opportunity, particularly for vulnerable populations suffering a disproportionate tobacco burden. One mechanism by which GHWs may influence smoking outcomes is by prompting interpersonal discussions within health discussion networks (the set of personal contacts with whom an individual discusses health issues). Objective The study examined the association between GHW-prompted conversations within health discussion networks and key tobacco-related outcomes, with attention to valence and content of the discussions. Method Between August 2013 and April 2014, we recruited 1200 individuals from three communities in Massachusetts, emphasizing recruitment of individuals of low socioeconomic position (SEP) and members of other selected vulnerable groups. Respondents were exposed to the nine GHWs proposed by the FDA in 2011, asked a series of questions, and assessed at follow-up a few weeks later. Results A total of 806 individuals were included in this analysis. About 51% of respondents reported having a health discussion network, with significantly lower reports among African-Americans and Hispanics compared to Whites. Around 70% of respondents (smokers and nonsmokers) with health discussion networks reported having one or more conversations about the GHWs with network members, the bulk of which were negative and focused on warning others about smoking. For smokers, we found a small but positive association between the percentage of network conversations that were negative and reports of quit attempts. Conclusion The results point to a potential mechanism by which GHWs may impact tobacco-related outcomes, prompting further inquiry into the role of health discussion networks (and discussion networks, more broadly) in tobacco control among low SEP individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-227
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume175
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

socioeconomic position
Social Support
social network
experiment
Health
health
nicotine
Tobacco
conversation
Warning
Experiment
Social Networks
smoking
Smoking
Vulnerable Populations
Hispanic Americans
Tobacco Products
African Americans

Keywords

  • Egocentric
  • Graphic health warnings
  • Low socioeconomic position
  • Social networks
  • Tobacco

Cite this

Graphic health warnings as activators of social networks : A field experiment among individuals of low socioeconomic position. / Ramanadhan, Shoba; Nagler, Rebekah H; McCloud, Rachel; Kohler, Racquel; Viswanath, Kasisomayajula.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 175, 01.02.2017, p. 219-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramanadhan, Shoba ; Nagler, Rebekah H ; McCloud, Rachel ; Kohler, Racquel ; Viswanath, Kasisomayajula. / Graphic health warnings as activators of social networks : A field experiment among individuals of low socioeconomic position. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 175. pp. 219-227.
@article{bc42daf44944495da480e33f9173e209,
title = "Graphic health warnings as activators of social networks: A field experiment among individuals of low socioeconomic position",
abstract = "Rationale Graphic health warnings (GHWs) on cigarette packages present an important tobacco control opportunity, particularly for vulnerable populations suffering a disproportionate tobacco burden. One mechanism by which GHWs may influence smoking outcomes is by prompting interpersonal discussions within health discussion networks (the set of personal contacts with whom an individual discusses health issues). Objective The study examined the association between GHW-prompted conversations within health discussion networks and key tobacco-related outcomes, with attention to valence and content of the discussions. Method Between August 2013 and April 2014, we recruited 1200 individuals from three communities in Massachusetts, emphasizing recruitment of individuals of low socioeconomic position (SEP) and members of other selected vulnerable groups. Respondents were exposed to the nine GHWs proposed by the FDA in 2011, asked a series of questions, and assessed at follow-up a few weeks later. Results A total of 806 individuals were included in this analysis. About 51{\%} of respondents reported having a health discussion network, with significantly lower reports among African-Americans and Hispanics compared to Whites. Around 70{\%} of respondents (smokers and nonsmokers) with health discussion networks reported having one or more conversations about the GHWs with network members, the bulk of which were negative and focused on warning others about smoking. For smokers, we found a small but positive association between the percentage of network conversations that were negative and reports of quit attempts. Conclusion The results point to a potential mechanism by which GHWs may impact tobacco-related outcomes, prompting further inquiry into the role of health discussion networks (and discussion networks, more broadly) in tobacco control among low SEP individuals.",
keywords = "Egocentric, Graphic health warnings, Low socioeconomic position, Social networks, Tobacco",
author = "Shoba Ramanadhan and Nagler, {Rebekah H} and Rachel McCloud and Racquel Kohler and Kasisomayajula Viswanath",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "175",
pages = "219--227",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Graphic health warnings as activators of social networks

T2 - A field experiment among individuals of low socioeconomic position

AU - Ramanadhan, Shoba

AU - Nagler, Rebekah H

AU - McCloud, Rachel

AU - Kohler, Racquel

AU - Viswanath, Kasisomayajula

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Rationale Graphic health warnings (GHWs) on cigarette packages present an important tobacco control opportunity, particularly for vulnerable populations suffering a disproportionate tobacco burden. One mechanism by which GHWs may influence smoking outcomes is by prompting interpersonal discussions within health discussion networks (the set of personal contacts with whom an individual discusses health issues). Objective The study examined the association between GHW-prompted conversations within health discussion networks and key tobacco-related outcomes, with attention to valence and content of the discussions. Method Between August 2013 and April 2014, we recruited 1200 individuals from three communities in Massachusetts, emphasizing recruitment of individuals of low socioeconomic position (SEP) and members of other selected vulnerable groups. Respondents were exposed to the nine GHWs proposed by the FDA in 2011, asked a series of questions, and assessed at follow-up a few weeks later. Results A total of 806 individuals were included in this analysis. About 51% of respondents reported having a health discussion network, with significantly lower reports among African-Americans and Hispanics compared to Whites. Around 70% of respondents (smokers and nonsmokers) with health discussion networks reported having one or more conversations about the GHWs with network members, the bulk of which were negative and focused on warning others about smoking. For smokers, we found a small but positive association between the percentage of network conversations that were negative and reports of quit attempts. Conclusion The results point to a potential mechanism by which GHWs may impact tobacco-related outcomes, prompting further inquiry into the role of health discussion networks (and discussion networks, more broadly) in tobacco control among low SEP individuals.

AB - Rationale Graphic health warnings (GHWs) on cigarette packages present an important tobacco control opportunity, particularly for vulnerable populations suffering a disproportionate tobacco burden. One mechanism by which GHWs may influence smoking outcomes is by prompting interpersonal discussions within health discussion networks (the set of personal contacts with whom an individual discusses health issues). Objective The study examined the association between GHW-prompted conversations within health discussion networks and key tobacco-related outcomes, with attention to valence and content of the discussions. Method Between August 2013 and April 2014, we recruited 1200 individuals from three communities in Massachusetts, emphasizing recruitment of individuals of low socioeconomic position (SEP) and members of other selected vulnerable groups. Respondents were exposed to the nine GHWs proposed by the FDA in 2011, asked a series of questions, and assessed at follow-up a few weeks later. Results A total of 806 individuals were included in this analysis. About 51% of respondents reported having a health discussion network, with significantly lower reports among African-Americans and Hispanics compared to Whites. Around 70% of respondents (smokers and nonsmokers) with health discussion networks reported having one or more conversations about the GHWs with network members, the bulk of which were negative and focused on warning others about smoking. For smokers, we found a small but positive association between the percentage of network conversations that were negative and reports of quit attempts. Conclusion The results point to a potential mechanism by which GHWs may impact tobacco-related outcomes, prompting further inquiry into the role of health discussion networks (and discussion networks, more broadly) in tobacco control among low SEP individuals.

KW - Egocentric

KW - Graphic health warnings

KW - Low socioeconomic position

KW - Social networks

KW - Tobacco

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009799294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009799294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.044

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.044

M3 - Article

VL - 175

SP - 219

EP - 227

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -