GRADE guidelines

11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D. Oxman, Shahnaz Sultan, Jan Brozek, Paul Glasziou, Pablo Alonso-Coello, David Atkins, Regina Kunz, Victor Montori, Roman Jaeschke, David Rind, Philipp Dahm, Elie A. Akl, Joerg Meerpohl, Gunn Vist, Elise Berliner, Susan Norris, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Holger J. Schünemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

311 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

GRADE requires guideline developers to make an overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence - high, moderate, low, or very low) for each important or critical outcome. GRADE suggests, for each outcome, the initial separate consideration of five domains of reasons for rating down the confidence in effect estimates, thereby allowing systematic review authors and guideline developers to arrive at an outcome-specific rating of confidence. Although this rating system represents discrete steps on an ordinal scale, it is helpful to view confidence in estimates as a continuum, and the final rating of confidence may differ from that suggested by separate consideration of each domain. An overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect is only relevant in settings when recommendations are being made. In general, it is based on the critical outcome that provides the lowest confidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-157
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume66
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

Guidelines

Keywords

  • Confidence in estimates
  • GRADE
  • Guideline methodology
  • Quality of evidence
  • Systematic review methodology
  • Values and preferences

Cite this

GRADE guidelines : 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. / Guyatt, Gordon; Oxman, Andrew D.; Sultan, Shahnaz; Brozek, Jan; Glasziou, Paul; Alonso-Coello, Pablo; Atkins, David; Kunz, Regina; Montori, Victor; Jaeschke, Roman; Rind, David; Dahm, Philipp; Akl, Elie A.; Meerpohl, Joerg; Vist, Gunn; Berliner, Elise; Norris, Susan; Falck-Ytter, Yngve; Schünemann, Holger J.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 66, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 151-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Guyatt, G, Oxman, AD, Sultan, S, Brozek, J, Glasziou, P, Alonso-Coello, P, Atkins, D, Kunz, R, Montori, V, Jaeschke, R, Rind, D, Dahm, P, Akl, EA, Meerpohl, J, Vist, G, Berliner, E, Norris, S, Falck-Ytter, Y & Schünemann, HJ 2013, 'GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006
Guyatt, Gordon ; Oxman, Andrew D. ; Sultan, Shahnaz ; Brozek, Jan ; Glasziou, Paul ; Alonso-Coello, Pablo ; Atkins, David ; Kunz, Regina ; Montori, Victor ; Jaeschke, Roman ; Rind, David ; Dahm, Philipp ; Akl, Elie A. ; Meerpohl, Joerg ; Vist, Gunn ; Berliner, Elise ; Norris, Susan ; Falck-Ytter, Yngve ; Schünemann, Holger J. / GRADE guidelines : 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2013 ; Vol. 66, No. 2. pp. 151-157.
@article{191437524d3840af967fc08e464b04fc,
title = "GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes",
abstract = "GRADE requires guideline developers to make an overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence - high, moderate, low, or very low) for each important or critical outcome. GRADE suggests, for each outcome, the initial separate consideration of five domains of reasons for rating down the confidence in effect estimates, thereby allowing systematic review authors and guideline developers to arrive at an outcome-specific rating of confidence. Although this rating system represents discrete steps on an ordinal scale, it is helpful to view confidence in estimates as a continuum, and the final rating of confidence may differ from that suggested by separate consideration of each domain. An overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect is only relevant in settings when recommendations are being made. In general, it is based on the critical outcome that provides the lowest confidence.",
keywords = "Confidence in estimates, GRADE, Guideline methodology, Quality of evidence, Systematic review methodology, Values and preferences",
author = "Gordon Guyatt and Oxman, {Andrew D.} and Shahnaz Sultan and Jan Brozek and Paul Glasziou and Pablo Alonso-Coello and David Atkins and Regina Kunz and Victor Montori and Roman Jaeschke and David Rind and Philipp Dahm and Akl, {Elie A.} and Joerg Meerpohl and Gunn Vist and Elise Berliner and Susan Norris and Yngve Falck-Ytter and Sch{\"u}nemann, {Holger J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "151--157",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - GRADE guidelines

T2 - 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

AU - Guyatt, Gordon

AU - Oxman, Andrew D.

AU - Sultan, Shahnaz

AU - Brozek, Jan

AU - Glasziou, Paul

AU - Alonso-Coello, Pablo

AU - Atkins, David

AU - Kunz, Regina

AU - Montori, Victor

AU - Jaeschke, Roman

AU - Rind, David

AU - Dahm, Philipp

AU - Akl, Elie A.

AU - Meerpohl, Joerg

AU - Vist, Gunn

AU - Berliner, Elise

AU - Norris, Susan

AU - Falck-Ytter, Yngve

AU - Schünemann, Holger J.

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - GRADE requires guideline developers to make an overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence - high, moderate, low, or very low) for each important or critical outcome. GRADE suggests, for each outcome, the initial separate consideration of five domains of reasons for rating down the confidence in effect estimates, thereby allowing systematic review authors and guideline developers to arrive at an outcome-specific rating of confidence. Although this rating system represents discrete steps on an ordinal scale, it is helpful to view confidence in estimates as a continuum, and the final rating of confidence may differ from that suggested by separate consideration of each domain. An overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect is only relevant in settings when recommendations are being made. In general, it is based on the critical outcome that provides the lowest confidence.

AB - GRADE requires guideline developers to make an overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence - high, moderate, low, or very low) for each important or critical outcome. GRADE suggests, for each outcome, the initial separate consideration of five domains of reasons for rating down the confidence in effect estimates, thereby allowing systematic review authors and guideline developers to arrive at an outcome-specific rating of confidence. Although this rating system represents discrete steps on an ordinal scale, it is helpful to view confidence in estimates as a continuum, and the final rating of confidence may differ from that suggested by separate consideration of each domain. An overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect is only relevant in settings when recommendations are being made. In general, it is based on the critical outcome that provides the lowest confidence.

KW - Confidence in estimates

KW - GRADE

KW - Guideline methodology

KW - Quality of evidence

KW - Systematic review methodology

KW - Values and preferences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871262970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871262970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 151

EP - 157

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 2

ER -