Good practices for quantitative bias analysis

Timothy L. Lash, Matthew P. Fox, Richard F. Maclehose, George Maldonado, Lawrence C. Mccandless, Sander Greenland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

148 Scopus citations

Abstract

Quantitative bias analysis serves several objectives in epidemiological research. First, it provides a quantitative estimate of the direction, magnitude and uncertainty arising from systematic errors. Second, the acts of identifying sources of systematic error, writing down models to quantify them, assigning values to the bias parameters and interpreting the results combat the human tendency towards overconfidence in research results, syntheses and critiques and the inferences that rest upon them. Finally, by suggesting aspects that dominate uncertainty in a particular research result or topic area, bias analysis can guide efficient allocation of sparse research resources. The fundamental methods of bias analyses have been known for decades, and there have been calls for more widespread use for nearly as long. There was a time when some believed that bias analyses were rarely undertaken because the methods were not widely known and because automated computing tools were not readily available to implement the methods. These shortcomings have been largely resolved. We must, therefore, contemplate other barriers to implementation. One possibility is that practitioners avoid the analyses because they lack confidence in the practice of bias analysis. The purpose of this paper is therefore to describe what we view as good practices for applying quantitative bias analysis to epidemiological data, directed towards those familiar with the methods. We focus on answering questions often posed to those of us who advocate incorporation of bias analysis methods into teaching and research. These include the following. When is bias analysis practical and productive? How does one select the biases that ought to be addressed? How does one select a method to model biases? How does one assign values to the parameters of a bias model? How does one present and interpret a bias analysis?.We hope that our guide to good practices for conducting and presenting bias analyses will encourage more widespread use of bias analysis to estimate the potential magnitude and direction of biases, as well as the uncertainty in estimates potentially influenced by the biases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberdyu149
Pages (from-to)1969-1985
Number of pages17
JournalInternational journal of epidemiology
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Keywords

  • Analysis
  • Best practice
  • Epidemiological biases

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Good practices for quantitative bias analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lash, T. L., Fox, M. P., Maclehose, R. F., Maldonado, G., Mccandless, L. C., & Greenland, S. (2014). Good practices for quantitative bias analysis. International journal of epidemiology, 43(6), 1969-1985. [dyu149]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu149