Goal selection vs. process control in non-invasive brain-computer interface

Audrey S. Royer; Minn L. Rose; Bin He

doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091051

Goal selection vs. process control in non-invasive brain-computer interface

Audrey S. Royer, Minn L. Rose, Bin He

Biomedical Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Today's brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) record the electrical signal from the cortex and use that signal to control an external device, such as a computer cursor, wheelchair, or neuroprosthetic. Two control strategies used by BCIs, process control and goal selection, differ in the amount of assistance the BCI system provides the user. This paper looks at non-invasive studies that directly compare goal selection to process control. In these studies, the assistance provided by a BCI using goal selection 1) increased the user's performance with the BCI and 2) resulted in an EEG signal that was more conducive to good performance.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	4235-4238
Number of pages	4
Journal	Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference
Volume	2011
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091051
State	Published - 2011
Event	33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2011 - Boston, MA, United States Duration: Aug 30 2011 → Sep 3 2011

PubMed: MeSH publication types

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Publisher link

10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091051

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

Goal selection vs. process control in non-invasive brain-computer interface. / Royer, Audrey S.; Rose, Minn L.; He, Bin.

In: Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference, Vol. 2011, 2011, p. 4235-4238.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

@article{cfc8846c2ab04c05a54b2d4228510025,

title = "Goal selection vs. process control in non-invasive brain-computer interface",

abstract = "Today's brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) record the electrical signal from the cortex and use that signal to control an external device, such as a computer cursor, wheelchair, or neuroprosthetic. Two control strategies used by BCIs, process control and goal selection, differ in the amount of assistance the BCI system provides the user. This paper looks at non-invasive studies that directly compare goal selection to process control. In these studies, the assistance provided by a BCI using goal selection 1) increased the user's performance with the BCI and 2) resulted in an EEG signal that was more conducive to good performance.",

author = "Royer, {Audrey S.} and Rose, {Minn L.} and Bin He",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091051",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2011",

pages = "4235--4238",

journal = "Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings",

issn = "1557-170X",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

note = "33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2011 ; Conference date: 30-08-2011 Through 03-09-2011",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Goal selection vs. process control in non-invasive brain-computer interface

AU - Royer, Audrey S.

AU - Rose, Minn L.

AU - He, Bin

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Today's brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) record the electrical signal from the cortex and use that signal to control an external device, such as a computer cursor, wheelchair, or neuroprosthetic. Two control strategies used by BCIs, process control and goal selection, differ in the amount of assistance the BCI system provides the user. This paper looks at non-invasive studies that directly compare goal selection to process control. In these studies, the assistance provided by a BCI using goal selection 1) increased the user's performance with the BCI and 2) resulted in an EEG signal that was more conducive to good performance.

AB - Today's brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) record the electrical signal from the cortex and use that signal to control an external device, such as a computer cursor, wheelchair, or neuroprosthetic. Two control strategies used by BCIs, process control and goal selection, differ in the amount of assistance the BCI system provides the user. This paper looks at non-invasive studies that directly compare goal selection to process control. In these studies, the assistance provided by a BCI using goal selection 1) increased the user's performance with the BCI and 2) resulted in an EEG signal that was more conducive to good performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84055194023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84055194023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091051

DO - 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091051

M3 - Article

C2 - 22255274

SN - 1557-170X

VL - 2011

SP - 4235

EP - 4238

JO - Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings

JF - Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings

T2 - 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2011

Y2 - 30 August 2011 through 3 September 2011

ER -

Goal selection vs. process control in non-invasive brain-computer interface

Abstract

PubMed: MeSH publication types

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this