Glomerular structural factors in progression of congenital nephrotic syndrome

Abhay N. Vats, Brian Costello, Michael Mauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The glomerular structural factors associated with progression of congenital nephrotic syndrome of Finnish type (CNF) are incompletely understood. We studied glomerular volume and the proportion of various glomerular subtypes in seven CNF patients (aged 4 months to 3 years). Glomerular tubular connections (GTC) were analyzed in two patients early and late in the disease spectrum (creatinine 0.2 and 2.8 mg/dl, respectively). The proportions of "normal" glomeruli decreased (r=-0.91, P=0.003) and microcystic glomeruli increased (r=0.85, P=0.015), while the fetal and sclerosed glomeruli remained stable (r=0.073 and 0.08 respectively, P=NS for both) with age. The "normal" glomeruli were larger in CNF than in six age-matched minimal change nephrotic patients (P=0.009). GTC analyses in the mild disease showed that 75% of the 12 "normal" glomeruli had normal tubules, and 25% were atubular or were attached to atrophic tubules, while 88% of the 12 fetal glomeruli were either atubular or were attached to atrophic tubules. In the advanced disease, 67% of 12 "normal" glomeruli had normal tubules, and 33% were atubular or atrophic, while none of the fetal or microcystic glomeruli had "normal tubules". Thus atubular glomeruli may play an important role in disease progression in CNF, as it is associated with a progressive decrease in hypertrophied "normal" glomeruli and an increase in largely atubular microcystic glomeruli.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)234-240
Number of pages7
JournalPediatric Nephrology
Volume18
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Keywords

  • Atubular glomeruli
  • Congenital nephrotic syndrome
  • Disease progression
  • Glomerular hypertrophy
  • Structural factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Glomerular structural factors in progression of congenital nephrotic syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this