Abstract
This paper critically evaluates the capacity of reasonableness to bend history toward peace. It compares the work of reasonableness in John Rawls’ (2005) ideal theory of the “law of peoples” to the norm’s appearance in the actual discourses of the “law of nations” in the early U.S. Congress. From that comparison, the paper draws out the rhetorical dimensions of reasonableness and its limits as an argumentative norm meant to guard against the legitimation of violence.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation |
| Editors | Bart Garssen, David Godden, Gordon R. Mitchell, Jean H. M. Wagemans |
| Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
| Publisher | Sic Sat: Sciential International Centre for Scholarship in Argumentation Theory |
| Pages | 620-627 |
| State | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Congress
- Discourse
- feminism
- Argumentation
- Foreign policy
- Law of Nations
- reasonableness
- war rhetoric
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Globalizing reasonableness: The law of nations” and the creation of foreign policy in the early U.S. Congress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS