Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Globalizing reasonableness: The law of nations” and the creation of foreign policy in the early U.S. Congress

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This paper critically evaluates the capacity of reasonableness to bend history toward peace. It compares the work of reasonableness in John Rawls’ (2005) ideal theory of the “law of peoples” to the norm’s appearance in the actual discourses of the “law of nations” in the early U.S. Congress. From that comparison, the paper draws out the rhetorical dimensions of reasonableness and its limits as an argumentative norm meant to guard against the legitimation of violence.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 9th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
EditorsBart Garssen, David Godden, Gordon R. Mitchell, Jean H. M. Wagemans
Place of PublicationAmsterdam
PublisherSic Sat: Sciential International Centre for Scholarship in Argumentation Theory
Pages620-627
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Congress
  • Discourse
  • feminism
  • Argumentation
  • Foreign policy
  • Law of Nations
  • reasonableness
  • war rhetoric

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Globalizing reasonableness: The law of nations” and the creation of foreign policy in the early U.S. Congress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this