Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Geographical differences in survival of dogs with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with a CHOP based chemotherapy protocol

  • H. Wilson-Robles
  • , C. M. Budke
  • , T. Miller
  • , N. Dervisis
  • , A. Novosad
  • , Z. Wright
  • , D. H. Thamm
  • , K. Vickery
  • , K. Burgess
  • , M. Childress
  • , J. Lori
  • , C. Saba
  • , S. Rau
  • , M. Silver
  • , G. Post
  • , K. Reeds
  • , S. Gillings
  • , S. Schleis
  • , T. Stein
  • , B. Brugmann
  • C. DeRegis, O. Smrkovski, J. Lawrence, T. Laver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In humans geographical differences in the incidence and presentation of various cancers have been reported. However, much of this information has not been collected in veterinary oncology. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine if a geographic difference in progression free survival exists for dogs with lymphoma treated within the US. Materials and Methods: Medical records of 775 cases of canine lymphoma from 3 US regions (west, south and north), treated with CHOP chemotherapy, were retrospectively evaluated. Cases were collected from referral institutions and were required to have received at least one doxorubicin treatment and have follow up information regarding time to progression. Results: Significant differences in sex (p = 0.05), weight (p = 0.049), stage (p < 0.001), immunophenotype (p = <0.001), and number of doxorubicin doses (p = 0.001) were seen between regions. Upon univariate analysis, progression free survival (PFS) differed by region (p = 0.006), stage (p = 0.009), sub-stage (p = 0.0005), and immunophenotype (p = 0.001). A multivariable Cox regression model showed that dogs in the western region had a significantly shorter PFS when compared to the south and east. Conclusion: PFS was significantly affected by stage, sub-stage and phenotype.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1564-1571
Number of pages8
JournalVeterinary and Comparative Oncology
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • CHOP
  • canine
  • geographical differences
  • location
  • lymphoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geographical differences in survival of dogs with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with a CHOP based chemotherapy protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this