Gentamicin Dosing Errors With Four Commonly Used Nomograms

Timothy S. Lesar, John C Rotschafer, Linda M. Strand, Lynn D. Solem, Darwin E. Zaske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Scopus citations


Four methods for calculating gentamicin sulfate dosage requirements were evaluated in 96 patients and compared with an individualized method. The pharmacokinetic parameters of gentamicin were determined from serum concentration time data and used to calculate individualized dosage regimens. Doses were determined in each patient using the “predictive methods” (Sarubbi-Hull, Dettli, “rule of eights,” and Chan). Resultant serum concentrations were calculated from doses arrived at by each method. These dosing methods resulted in a large proportion of patients with subtherapeutic or potentially toxic concentrations, or both. The Dettli and Chan methods produced therapeutic concentrations in more patients than the Sarubbi-Hull and rule of eights methods. Desired therapeutic concentrations were attained in significantly more patients with the individualized method than with the predictive methods, and, in addition, larger doses were required. The use of predictive dosage methods should be followed with serum concentration determinations and dosage adjustment to ensure therapeutic concentrations early in treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1190-1193
Number of pages4
JournalJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Issue number10
StatePublished - Sep 10 1982


Dive into the research topics of 'Gentamicin Dosing Errors With Four Commonly Used Nomograms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this