TY - JOUR
T1 - Genomic variation in myeloma
T2 - Design, content, and initial application of the Bank On A Cure SNP Panel to detect associations with progression-free survival
AU - Van Ness, Brian
AU - Ramos, Christine
AU - Haznadar, Majda
AU - Hoering, Antje
AU - Haessler, Jeff
AU - Crowley, John
AU - Jacobus, Susanna
AU - Oken, Martin
AU - Rajkumar, Vincent
AU - Greipp, Philip
AU - Barlogie, Bart
AU - Durie, Brian
AU - Katz, Michael
AU - Atluri, Gowtham
AU - Fang, Gang
AU - Gupta, Rohit
AU - Steinbach, Michael
AU - Kumar, Vipin
AU - Mushlin, Richard
AU - Johnson, David
AU - Morgan, Gareth
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the International Myeloma Foundation; a grant from the National Institutes of Health to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PO1 CA62242 (to BVN) and the Southwest Oncology Group 5U10CA038926 (to JC); and NSF Grant CNS-0551551 (to VK).
PY - 2008/9/8
Y1 - 2008/9/8
N2 - Background: We have engaged in an international program designated the Bank On A Cure, which has established DNA banks from multiple cooperative and institutional clinical trials, and a platform for examining the association of genetic variations with disease risk and outcomes in multiple myeloma. We describe the development and content of a novel custom SNP panel that contains 3404 SNPs in 983 genes, representing cellular functions and pathways that may influence disease severity at diagnosis, toxicity, progression or other treatment outcomes. A systematic search of national databases was used to identify non-synonymous coding SNPs and SNPs within transcriptional regulatory regions. To explore SNP associations with PFS we compared SNP profiles of short term (less than 1 year, n = 70) versus long term progression-free survivors (greater than 3 years, n = 73) in two phase III clinical trials. Results: Quality controls were established, demonstrating an accurate and robust screening panel for genetic variations, and some initial racial comparisons of allelic variation were done. A variety of analytical approaches, including machine learning tools for data mining and recursive partitioning analyses, demonstrated predictive value of the SNP panel in survival. While the entire SNP panel showed genotype predictive association with PFS, some SNP subsets were identified within drug response, cellular signaling and cell cycle genes. Conclusion: A targeted gene approach was undertaken to develop an SNP panel that can test for associations with clinical outcomes in myeloma. The initial analysis provided some predictive power, demonstrating that genetic variations in the myeloma patient population may influence PFS.
AB - Background: We have engaged in an international program designated the Bank On A Cure, which has established DNA banks from multiple cooperative and institutional clinical trials, and a platform for examining the association of genetic variations with disease risk and outcomes in multiple myeloma. We describe the development and content of a novel custom SNP panel that contains 3404 SNPs in 983 genes, representing cellular functions and pathways that may influence disease severity at diagnosis, toxicity, progression or other treatment outcomes. A systematic search of national databases was used to identify non-synonymous coding SNPs and SNPs within transcriptional regulatory regions. To explore SNP associations with PFS we compared SNP profiles of short term (less than 1 year, n = 70) versus long term progression-free survivors (greater than 3 years, n = 73) in two phase III clinical trials. Results: Quality controls were established, demonstrating an accurate and robust screening panel for genetic variations, and some initial racial comparisons of allelic variation were done. A variety of analytical approaches, including machine learning tools for data mining and recursive partitioning analyses, demonstrated predictive value of the SNP panel in survival. While the entire SNP panel showed genotype predictive association with PFS, some SNP subsets were identified within drug response, cellular signaling and cell cycle genes. Conclusion: A targeted gene approach was undertaken to develop an SNP panel that can test for associations with clinical outcomes in myeloma. The initial analysis provided some predictive power, demonstrating that genetic variations in the myeloma patient population may influence PFS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52449099461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52449099461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1741-7015-6-26
DO - 10.1186/1741-7015-6-26
M3 - Article
C2 - 18778477
AN - SCOPUS:52449099461
SN - 1741-7015
VL - 6
JO - BMC medicine
JF - BMC medicine
M1 - 26
ER -