TY - JOUR
T1 - Generosity without borders
T2 - The interactive effect of spatial distance and donation goals on charitable giving
AU - Xu, Alison Jing
AU - Rodas, Maria A.
AU - Torelli, Carlos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Although past research suggests that people are more likely to donate money to nearby causes to maximize their positive impact on others’ lives, donations to foreign causes are growing rapidly. Incorporating both other-focused impact goals and self-focused moral goals into our conceptualization, we propose that an interplay between the accessibility of impact/moral goals and the spatial distance between donors and recipients of charitable causes (e.g., faraway vs. nearby recipients) influences charitable behaviors (e.g., donation amounts and charitable choices). Specifically, when the goal to maintain a moral self-concept (impact recipients’ lives) is accessible, donors experience a more expansive conception of their moral circle (apply the “closeness-equals-impact” heuristic) and donate more money to faraway (nearby) causes. We further demonstrate that moral (impact) goals are more abstract (concrete) motivations, and their effects also emerge when priming an abstract (concrete) mindset. Five studies support these predictions while ruling out alternative interpretations.
AB - Although past research suggests that people are more likely to donate money to nearby causes to maximize their positive impact on others’ lives, donations to foreign causes are growing rapidly. Incorporating both other-focused impact goals and self-focused moral goals into our conceptualization, we propose that an interplay between the accessibility of impact/moral goals and the spatial distance between donors and recipients of charitable causes (e.g., faraway vs. nearby recipients) influences charitable behaviors (e.g., donation amounts and charitable choices). Specifically, when the goal to maintain a moral self-concept (impact recipients’ lives) is accessible, donors experience a more expansive conception of their moral circle (apply the “closeness-equals-impact” heuristic) and donate more money to faraway (nearby) causes. We further demonstrate that moral (impact) goals are more abstract (concrete) motivations, and their effects also emerge when priming an abstract (concrete) mindset. Five studies support these predictions while ruling out alternative interpretations.
KW - Donation goals
KW - Expanded circle of moral regard
KW - Impact
KW - Knowledge accessibility
KW - Moral identity
KW - Moral self-concept
KW - Spatial distance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086442562&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086442562&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.01.007
DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.01.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086442562
SN - 0749-5978
VL - 161
SP - 65
EP - 78
JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
ER -