TY - JOUR
T1 - General combining ability model for genomewide selection in a biparental cross
AU - Jacobson, Amy
AU - Lian, Lian
AU - Zhong, Shengqiang
AU - Bernardo, Rex
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Genomewide selection within an A/B biparental cross is most advantageous if it could be effectively done before the cross is phenotyped. Our objectives were to determine if a general combining ability (GCA) model is useful for genomewide selection in an A/B cross, and to assess the influence of training population size (NGCA), number of crosses pooled into the training population (N×), linkage disequilibrium (r2), and heritability (h2) on the prediction accuracy with the GCA model. The GCA model involved pooling 4 to 38 maize crosses with A and B as one of the parents into the training population for an A/B cross, whereas the same background (SB) model involved pooling crosses between random inbreds. Across 30 A/B test populations, the mean response to selection (R) with the GCA model was 0.19 Mg ha-1 for testcross grain yield, -6 g kg-1 for moisture, and 0.38 kg hL-1 for test weight. These R values with the GCA model were 68 to 76% of the corresponding R values with phenotypic selection (PS). The R values with the SB model were only 15 to 28% of the R values with PS. Increasing the size of the training population with random crosses from the same heterotic group was less important than including crosses with A and B as one of the parents. Prediction accuracy was most highly correlated with h2r2 √NGCA and h2r2 √N×. Our results indicated that the GCA model is routinely effective for genomewide selection within A/B crosses, before phenotyping the progeny in the cross.
AB - Genomewide selection within an A/B biparental cross is most advantageous if it could be effectively done before the cross is phenotyped. Our objectives were to determine if a general combining ability (GCA) model is useful for genomewide selection in an A/B cross, and to assess the influence of training population size (NGCA), number of crosses pooled into the training population (N×), linkage disequilibrium (r2), and heritability (h2) on the prediction accuracy with the GCA model. The GCA model involved pooling 4 to 38 maize crosses with A and B as one of the parents into the training population for an A/B cross, whereas the same background (SB) model involved pooling crosses between random inbreds. Across 30 A/B test populations, the mean response to selection (R) with the GCA model was 0.19 Mg ha-1 for testcross grain yield, -6 g kg-1 for moisture, and 0.38 kg hL-1 for test weight. These R values with the GCA model were 68 to 76% of the corresponding R values with phenotypic selection (PS). The R values with the SB model were only 15 to 28% of the R values with PS. Increasing the size of the training population with random crosses from the same heterotic group was less important than including crosses with A and B as one of the parents. Prediction accuracy was most highly correlated with h2r2 √NGCA and h2r2 √N×. Our results indicated that the GCA model is routinely effective for genomewide selection within A/B crosses, before phenotyping the progeny in the cross.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898447796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898447796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2135/cropsci2013.11.0774
DO - 10.2135/cropsci2013.11.0774
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84898447796
SN - 0011-183X
VL - 54
SP - 895
EP - 905
JO - Crop Science
JF - Crop Science
IS - 3
ER -