Abstract
The relationships between two measures proposed to describe personality pathology, that is the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-3) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), are examined in an undergraduate sample (N = 240). The NEO inventories are general trait measures, also considered relevant to assess disordered personality, whereas the PID-5 measure is specifically designed to assess pathological personality traits, as conceptualized in the DSM-5 proposal. A structural analysis of the 25 PID-5 traits confirmed the factor structure observed in the U.S. derivation sample, with higher order factors of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. A joint factor analysis of, respectively, the NEO domains and their facets with the PID-5 traits showed that general and maladaptive traits are subsumed under an umbrella of five to six major dimensions that can be interpreted from the perspective of the five-factor model or the Personality Psychopathology Five. Implications for the assessment of personality pathology and the construction of models of psychopathology grounded in personality are discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 295-307 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Assessment |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2013 |
Keywords
- DSM-5
- FFM
- NEO-PI-3
- PID-5
- Personality Inventory for DSM-5
- Revised NEO Personality Inventory
- assessment
- five-factor model
- general traits
- personality disorders