Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gender-Affirming Surgery and Cancer: Considerations for Radiation Oncologists for Pelvic Radiation in Transfeminine Patients

  • Alicia C. Smart
  • , Kevin X. Liu
  • , Jason D. Domogauer
  • , Carlos Rodriguez-Russo
  • , Brianna Jones
  • , Daniel R. Dickstein
  • , Joseph D. Mancias
  • , Ron Y. Shiloh
  • , Anton Wintner
  • , Anthony L. Zietman
  • , Deborah C. Marshall
  • , M. Aiven Dyer
  • , Andrea L. Russo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Access to gender-affirming surgery is increasing for many transgender and nonbinary people in the United States, and radiation oncologists must be equipped to care for patients who have undergone such surgery in the region of their planned radiation treatment field. There are no guidelines for radiation treatment planning after gender-affirming surgery, and most oncologists do not receive training in the unique needs of transgender people with cancer. We review common gender-affirming genitopelvic surgeries for transfeminine people, including vaginoplasty, labiaplasty, and orchiectomy, and summarize the existing literature on the treatment of cancers of the neovagina, anus, rectum, prostate, and bladder in these patients. We also describe our systematic treatment approach and rationale for pelvic radiation treatment planning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-311
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume117
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender-Affirming Surgery and Cancer: Considerations for Radiation Oncologists for Pelvic Radiation in Transfeminine Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this