TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional organization of parietal neuronal responses to optic-flow stimuli
AU - Merchant Nancy, Hugo
AU - Battaglia-Mayer, Alexandra
AU - Georgopoulos, Apostolos P.
PY - 2003/8/1
Y1 - 2003/8/1
N2 - We analyzed the dissimilarity matrix of neuronal responses to moving visual stimuli using tree clustering and multidimensional scaling (MDS). Single-cell activity was recorded in area 7a while random dots moving coherently in eight different kinds of motion (right-, left-, up-, and downward, clockwise, counterclockwise, expansion, contraction) were presented to behaving monkeys with eyes fixated. Tree clustering analyses showed that the {rightward, leftward}, {upward, downward}, and {clockwise, counterclockwise]} motions were clustered in three separate branches (i.e., horizontal, vertical, and rotatory motion, respectively). In contrast, expansion was in a lone branch, whereas contraction was also separate but within a larger cluster. The distances among these clusters were then subjected to an MDS analysis to identify the dimensions underlying the tree clustering observed. This analysis revealed two major factors in operation. The first factor separated expansion from all other stimulus motions, which seems to reflect the prominence of expansion during the common activity of locomotion. In contrast, the second factor separated planar motions from motion in depth, which suggests that the latter may hold a special place in visual motion processing.
AB - We analyzed the dissimilarity matrix of neuronal responses to moving visual stimuli using tree clustering and multidimensional scaling (MDS). Single-cell activity was recorded in area 7a while random dots moving coherently in eight different kinds of motion (right-, left-, up-, and downward, clockwise, counterclockwise, expansion, contraction) were presented to behaving monkeys with eyes fixated. Tree clustering analyses showed that the {rightward, leftward}, {upward, downward}, and {clockwise, counterclockwise]} motions were clustered in three separate branches (i.e., horizontal, vertical, and rotatory motion, respectively). In contrast, expansion was in a lone branch, whereas contraction was also separate but within a larger cluster. The distances among these clusters were then subjected to an MDS analysis to identify the dimensions underlying the tree clustering observed. This analysis revealed two major factors in operation. The first factor separated expansion from all other stimulus motions, which seems to reflect the prominence of expansion during the common activity of locomotion. In contrast, the second factor separated planar motions from motion in depth, which suggests that the latter may hold a special place in visual motion processing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042316841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042316841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/jn.00331.2003
DO - 10.1152/jn.00331.2003
M3 - Article
C2 - 12904489
AN - SCOPUS:0042316841
SN - 0022-3077
VL - 90
SP - 675
EP - 682
JO - Journal of neurophysiology
JF - Journal of neurophysiology
IS - 2
ER -