Framing the war on terror: The internalization of policy in the US press

Stephen D. Reese, Seth C. Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The War on Terror was the label assigned by the Bush administration to its national security policy, launched in response to the attacks of 9/11. The cultural construction and political rationale supporting this slogan represent a powerful organizing principle that has become a widely accepted framing, laying the groundwork for the invasion of Iraq. We examine this framing where its sponsors intersect with US journalism, as illustrated by news texts. Broadly, we examine trends in how news reports refer to the War on Terror and provide an interpretive analysis of stories in USA Today. From the period of September 2001 to early 2006, these news texts suggest that the frame was internalized by the US press. News and editorial reports went beyond 'transmitting' the label as shorthand for administration policy, to 'reify' the policy as uncontested, and 'naturalize' it as a taken-for-granted common-sense notion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)777-797
Number of pages21
JournalJournalism
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

Printing presses
internalization
Labels
terrorism
news
National security
news report
security policy
national security
invasion
journalism
Iraq
trend
War on Terror
News
Internalization

Keywords

  • Framing
  • Ideology
  • News routines
  • News texts
  • War on terror

Cite this

Framing the war on terror : The internalization of policy in the US press. / Reese, Stephen D.; Lewis, Seth C.

In: Journalism, Vol. 10, No. 6, 01.12.2009, p. 777-797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reese, Stephen D. ; Lewis, Seth C. / Framing the war on terror : The internalization of policy in the US press. In: Journalism. 2009 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 777-797.
@article{17e34bb438374442bdc66d5f609a4f1b,
title = "Framing the war on terror: The internalization of policy in the US press",
abstract = "The War on Terror was the label assigned by the Bush administration to its national security policy, launched in response to the attacks of 9/11. The cultural construction and political rationale supporting this slogan represent a powerful organizing principle that has become a widely accepted framing, laying the groundwork for the invasion of Iraq. We examine this framing where its sponsors intersect with US journalism, as illustrated by news texts. Broadly, we examine trends in how news reports refer to the War on Terror and provide an interpretive analysis of stories in USA Today. From the period of September 2001 to early 2006, these news texts suggest that the frame was internalized by the US press. News and editorial reports went beyond 'transmitting' the label as shorthand for administration policy, to 'reify' the policy as uncontested, and 'naturalize' it as a taken-for-granted common-sense notion.",
keywords = "Framing, Ideology, News routines, News texts, War on terror",
author = "Reese, {Stephen D.} and Lewis, {Seth C.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1464884909344480",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "777--797",
journal = "Journalism",
issn = "1464-8849",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing the war on terror

T2 - The internalization of policy in the US press

AU - Reese, Stephen D.

AU - Lewis, Seth C.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - The War on Terror was the label assigned by the Bush administration to its national security policy, launched in response to the attacks of 9/11. The cultural construction and political rationale supporting this slogan represent a powerful organizing principle that has become a widely accepted framing, laying the groundwork for the invasion of Iraq. We examine this framing where its sponsors intersect with US journalism, as illustrated by news texts. Broadly, we examine trends in how news reports refer to the War on Terror and provide an interpretive analysis of stories in USA Today. From the period of September 2001 to early 2006, these news texts suggest that the frame was internalized by the US press. News and editorial reports went beyond 'transmitting' the label as shorthand for administration policy, to 'reify' the policy as uncontested, and 'naturalize' it as a taken-for-granted common-sense notion.

AB - The War on Terror was the label assigned by the Bush administration to its national security policy, launched in response to the attacks of 9/11. The cultural construction and political rationale supporting this slogan represent a powerful organizing principle that has become a widely accepted framing, laying the groundwork for the invasion of Iraq. We examine this framing where its sponsors intersect with US journalism, as illustrated by news texts. Broadly, we examine trends in how news reports refer to the War on Terror and provide an interpretive analysis of stories in USA Today. From the period of September 2001 to early 2006, these news texts suggest that the frame was internalized by the US press. News and editorial reports went beyond 'transmitting' the label as shorthand for administration policy, to 'reify' the policy as uncontested, and 'naturalize' it as a taken-for-granted common-sense notion.

KW - Framing

KW - Ideology

KW - News routines

KW - News texts

KW - War on terror

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950309832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950309832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1464884909344480

DO - 10.1177/1464884909344480

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77950309832

VL - 10

SP - 777

EP - 797

JO - Journalism

JF - Journalism

SN - 1464-8849

IS - 6

ER -