Framing Food Policy: The Case of Raw Milk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Policies governing the sale of raw milk—making the sales of raw milk more permissive—are gaining traction on the legislative agendas of dozens of states. This paper examines one contributor to this movement on the policy agenda: the role of competitive framing. By combining theoretical approaches from policy studies and political psychology theories of competitive framing, we offer evidence supporting the recent relative success of raw milk activists in several state legislatures. Using an Internet survey-based experiment with a sample size of 1,630 respondents from seven Midwestern states, we show that a frame emphasizing consumer choice and food freedom is more effective than the frame that dominates among the policy establishment, that emphasizing public health risks. This is true in both one-sided and competitive framing contexts. We further show that those previously aware of this issue were less influenced by the public health frame than those naïve to the issue. Our results suggest that the pro-raw milk movement may be making strides on the state policy agenda because their frames are more resonant among the public. We also highlight the advantages gained from considering psychological and policy processes simultaneously to understand policy change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-383
Number of pages25
JournalPolicy Studies Journal
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

food policy
milk
public health
political psychology
food
policy studies
health risk
online survey
sale
sales
experiment
evidence
psychology
policy

Keywords

  • competitive framing
  • food policy
  • raw milk
  • social movements

Cite this

Framing Food Policy : The Case of Raw Milk. / Rahn, Wendy M.; Gollust, Sarah E.; Tang, Xuyang.

In: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.05.2017, p. 359-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4746fc48e35b433e913d7f03b01d9779,
title = "Framing Food Policy: The Case of Raw Milk",
abstract = "Policies governing the sale of raw milk—making the sales of raw milk more permissive—are gaining traction on the legislative agendas of dozens of states. This paper examines one contributor to this movement on the policy agenda: the role of competitive framing. By combining theoretical approaches from policy studies and political psychology theories of competitive framing, we offer evidence supporting the recent relative success of raw milk activists in several state legislatures. Using an Internet survey-based experiment with a sample size of 1,630 respondents from seven Midwestern states, we show that a frame emphasizing consumer choice and food freedom is more effective than the frame that dominates among the policy establishment, that emphasizing public health risks. This is true in both one-sided and competitive framing contexts. We further show that those previously aware of this issue were less influenced by the public health frame than those na{\"i}ve to the issue. Our results suggest that the pro-raw milk movement may be making strides on the state policy agenda because their frames are more resonant among the public. We also highlight the advantages gained from considering psychological and policy processes simultaneously to understand policy change.",
keywords = "competitive framing, food policy, raw milk, social movements",
author = "Rahn, {Wendy M.} and Gollust, {Sarah E.} and Xuyang Tang",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/psj.12161",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "359--383",
journal = "Policy Studies Journal",
issn = "0190-292X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing Food Policy

T2 - The Case of Raw Milk

AU - Rahn, Wendy M.

AU - Gollust, Sarah E.

AU - Tang, Xuyang

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Policies governing the sale of raw milk—making the sales of raw milk more permissive—are gaining traction on the legislative agendas of dozens of states. This paper examines one contributor to this movement on the policy agenda: the role of competitive framing. By combining theoretical approaches from policy studies and political psychology theories of competitive framing, we offer evidence supporting the recent relative success of raw milk activists in several state legislatures. Using an Internet survey-based experiment with a sample size of 1,630 respondents from seven Midwestern states, we show that a frame emphasizing consumer choice and food freedom is more effective than the frame that dominates among the policy establishment, that emphasizing public health risks. This is true in both one-sided and competitive framing contexts. We further show that those previously aware of this issue were less influenced by the public health frame than those naïve to the issue. Our results suggest that the pro-raw milk movement may be making strides on the state policy agenda because their frames are more resonant among the public. We also highlight the advantages gained from considering psychological and policy processes simultaneously to understand policy change.

AB - Policies governing the sale of raw milk—making the sales of raw milk more permissive—are gaining traction on the legislative agendas of dozens of states. This paper examines one contributor to this movement on the policy agenda: the role of competitive framing. By combining theoretical approaches from policy studies and political psychology theories of competitive framing, we offer evidence supporting the recent relative success of raw milk activists in several state legislatures. Using an Internet survey-based experiment with a sample size of 1,630 respondents from seven Midwestern states, we show that a frame emphasizing consumer choice and food freedom is more effective than the frame that dominates among the policy establishment, that emphasizing public health risks. This is true in both one-sided and competitive framing contexts. We further show that those previously aware of this issue were less influenced by the public health frame than those naïve to the issue. Our results suggest that the pro-raw milk movement may be making strides on the state policy agenda because their frames are more resonant among the public. We also highlight the advantages gained from considering psychological and policy processes simultaneously to understand policy change.

KW - competitive framing

KW - food policy

KW - raw milk

KW - social movements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963612048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963612048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/psj.12161

DO - 10.1111/psj.12161

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84963612048

VL - 45

SP - 359

EP - 383

JO - Policy Studies Journal

JF - Policy Studies Journal

SN - 0190-292X

IS - 2

ER -