Framing, engagement, and policy change: Lessons for the ACA

Andrew J Karch, Aaron Rosenthal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Supporters of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) sometimes speculate that public attitudes toward the law will shift if proponents succeed in focusing attention on its more popular components, but the scholarly literature on framing effects provides ample reason to question their assertion. This article contends that engagement, an alternative rhetorical strategy where advocates address the same policy dimensions as their opponents, is a more promising approach. Extending the engagement literature to the elite context in which most ACA-related decisions are made, it argues that elite-level engagement necessitates the additional task of linking policy change to opponents' broader philosophical and policy goals. Current debates surrounding the application of sales taxes to electronic commerce-a policy arena that seems far removed from health care policy but overlaps with the ACA in ways that make it an appropriate source of lesson drawing-illustrate the potential of an engagement strategy. Recently, many conservative lawmakers who previously opposed policy change have instead embraced online sales taxes as a mechanism for additional tax cuts. Analogous connections may facilitate the diffusion of ACA provisions that presently receive hostile receptions in Republican-leaning states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-362
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of health politics, policy and law
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Taxes
Health Policy
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Health care reform
  • Policy diffusion
  • Rhetorical strategies

Cite this

Framing, engagement, and policy change : Lessons for the ACA. / Karch, Andrew J; Rosenthal, Aaron.

In: Journal of health politics, policy and law, Vol. 42, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 341-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d564f2f11eb241dcb82675fbfc709a8d,
title = "Framing, engagement, and policy change: Lessons for the ACA",
abstract = "Supporters of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) sometimes speculate that public attitudes toward the law will shift if proponents succeed in focusing attention on its more popular components, but the scholarly literature on framing effects provides ample reason to question their assertion. This article contends that engagement, an alternative rhetorical strategy where advocates address the same policy dimensions as their opponents, is a more promising approach. Extending the engagement literature to the elite context in which most ACA-related decisions are made, it argues that elite-level engagement necessitates the additional task of linking policy change to opponents' broader philosophical and policy goals. Current debates surrounding the application of sales taxes to electronic commerce-a policy arena that seems far removed from health care policy but overlaps with the ACA in ways that make it an appropriate source of lesson drawing-illustrate the potential of an engagement strategy. Recently, many conservative lawmakers who previously opposed policy change have instead embraced online sales taxes as a mechanism for additional tax cuts. Analogous connections may facilitate the diffusion of ACA provisions that presently receive hostile receptions in Republican-leaning states.",
keywords = "Health care reform, Policy diffusion, Rhetorical strategies",
author = "Karch, {Andrew J} and Aaron Rosenthal",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1215/03616878-3766746",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "341--362",
journal = "Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing, engagement, and policy change

T2 - Lessons for the ACA

AU - Karch, Andrew J

AU - Rosenthal, Aaron

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Supporters of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) sometimes speculate that public attitudes toward the law will shift if proponents succeed in focusing attention on its more popular components, but the scholarly literature on framing effects provides ample reason to question their assertion. This article contends that engagement, an alternative rhetorical strategy where advocates address the same policy dimensions as their opponents, is a more promising approach. Extending the engagement literature to the elite context in which most ACA-related decisions are made, it argues that elite-level engagement necessitates the additional task of linking policy change to opponents' broader philosophical and policy goals. Current debates surrounding the application of sales taxes to electronic commerce-a policy arena that seems far removed from health care policy but overlaps with the ACA in ways that make it an appropriate source of lesson drawing-illustrate the potential of an engagement strategy. Recently, many conservative lawmakers who previously opposed policy change have instead embraced online sales taxes as a mechanism for additional tax cuts. Analogous connections may facilitate the diffusion of ACA provisions that presently receive hostile receptions in Republican-leaning states.

AB - Supporters of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) sometimes speculate that public attitudes toward the law will shift if proponents succeed in focusing attention on its more popular components, but the scholarly literature on framing effects provides ample reason to question their assertion. This article contends that engagement, an alternative rhetorical strategy where advocates address the same policy dimensions as their opponents, is a more promising approach. Extending the engagement literature to the elite context in which most ACA-related decisions are made, it argues that elite-level engagement necessitates the additional task of linking policy change to opponents' broader philosophical and policy goals. Current debates surrounding the application of sales taxes to electronic commerce-a policy arena that seems far removed from health care policy but overlaps with the ACA in ways that make it an appropriate source of lesson drawing-illustrate the potential of an engagement strategy. Recently, many conservative lawmakers who previously opposed policy change have instead embraced online sales taxes as a mechanism for additional tax cuts. Analogous connections may facilitate the diffusion of ACA provisions that presently receive hostile receptions in Republican-leaning states.

KW - Health care reform

KW - Policy diffusion

KW - Rhetorical strategies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015824616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015824616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/03616878-3766746

DO - 10.1215/03616878-3766746

M3 - Article

C2 - 28007797

AN - SCOPUS:85015824616

VL - 42

SP - 341

EP - 362

JO - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

JF - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

SN - 0361-6878

IS - 2

ER -