Fracture toughness and microhardness of a composite

Do they correlate?

D. Tantbirojn, A. Versluis, Y. S. Cheng, William H Douglas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. Chipping and bulk fracture are major contributors in clinical failures of composite restorations. Fracture toughness (KIc) quantifies susceptibility for fracture, but experimental determination is complicated. It would be beneficial for the dental community if a relatively simple experiment, such as microhardness (HK), could be used to screen composites for fracture resistance. This study explores a possible correlation between KIc and HK. Methods. Composite cylinders (4mm diameter and ∼7mm long) were cured for five combinations of light intensity (I, mW/cm2) and curing time (T, s) to achieve a range of different total light energy densities (I×T=100×10, 100×20, 300×20, 300×40, and 700×60mWs/cm2). A chevron-notch was cut in the median plane of the cylinders for the fracture toughness test, which was executed in a displacement control mode at 6μm/s cross-head speed (sample size 4). Knoop hardness was determined at the median plane of the cylinders (sample size 6). The tests were performed 15min and 24h after curing. Results. Both the KIc and HK increased with increased light energy density and storage time. Linear regression analysis indicated a strong correlation between HK and KIc tested at the same time period (R2=0.97 and 0.90 for 15min and 24h, respectively). The correlation became weaker between the different storage times (R2=0.71), indicating a change in fracture toughness and/or microhardness mechanisms. Conclusion. Fracture toughness of a composite cannot be simply extrapolated from microhardness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-95
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Light
Sample Size
Hardness
Linear Models
Tooth
Head
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Composite
  • Fracture toughness
  • Microhardness

Cite this

Fracture toughness and microhardness of a composite : Do they correlate? / Tantbirojn, D.; Versluis, A.; Cheng, Y. S.; Douglas, William H.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.01.2003, p. 89-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tantbirojn, D, Versluis, A, Cheng, YS & Douglas, WH 2003, 'Fracture toughness and microhardness of a composite: Do they correlate?', Journal of Dentistry, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00008-3
Tantbirojn, D. ; Versluis, A. ; Cheng, Y. S. ; Douglas, William H. / Fracture toughness and microhardness of a composite : Do they correlate?. In: Journal of Dentistry. 2003 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 89-95.
@article{338cb79b8dcf4987bb5fae5a321d9928,
title = "Fracture toughness and microhardness of a composite: Do they correlate?",
abstract = "Objectives. Chipping and bulk fracture are major contributors in clinical failures of composite restorations. Fracture toughness (KIc) quantifies susceptibility for fracture, but experimental determination is complicated. It would be beneficial for the dental community if a relatively simple experiment, such as microhardness (HK), could be used to screen composites for fracture resistance. This study explores a possible correlation between KIc and HK. Methods. Composite cylinders (4mm diameter and ∼7mm long) were cured for five combinations of light intensity (I, mW/cm2) and curing time (T, s) to achieve a range of different total light energy densities (I×T=100×10, 100×20, 300×20, 300×40, and 700×60mWs/cm2). A chevron-notch was cut in the median plane of the cylinders for the fracture toughness test, which was executed in a displacement control mode at 6μm/s cross-head speed (sample size 4). Knoop hardness was determined at the median plane of the cylinders (sample size 6). The tests were performed 15min and 24h after curing. Results. Both the KIc and HK increased with increased light energy density and storage time. Linear regression analysis indicated a strong correlation between HK and KIc tested at the same time period (R2=0.97 and 0.90 for 15min and 24h, respectively). The correlation became weaker between the different storage times (R2=0.71), indicating a change in fracture toughness and/or microhardness mechanisms. Conclusion. Fracture toughness of a composite cannot be simply extrapolated from microhardness.",
keywords = "Composite, Fracture toughness, Microhardness",
author = "D. Tantbirojn and A. Versluis and Cheng, {Y. S.} and Douglas, {William H}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00008-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "89--95",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fracture toughness and microhardness of a composite

T2 - Do they correlate?

AU - Tantbirojn, D.

AU - Versluis, A.

AU - Cheng, Y. S.

AU - Douglas, William H

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Objectives. Chipping and bulk fracture are major contributors in clinical failures of composite restorations. Fracture toughness (KIc) quantifies susceptibility for fracture, but experimental determination is complicated. It would be beneficial for the dental community if a relatively simple experiment, such as microhardness (HK), could be used to screen composites for fracture resistance. This study explores a possible correlation between KIc and HK. Methods. Composite cylinders (4mm diameter and ∼7mm long) were cured for five combinations of light intensity (I, mW/cm2) and curing time (T, s) to achieve a range of different total light energy densities (I×T=100×10, 100×20, 300×20, 300×40, and 700×60mWs/cm2). A chevron-notch was cut in the median plane of the cylinders for the fracture toughness test, which was executed in a displacement control mode at 6μm/s cross-head speed (sample size 4). Knoop hardness was determined at the median plane of the cylinders (sample size 6). The tests were performed 15min and 24h after curing. Results. Both the KIc and HK increased with increased light energy density and storage time. Linear regression analysis indicated a strong correlation between HK and KIc tested at the same time period (R2=0.97 and 0.90 for 15min and 24h, respectively). The correlation became weaker between the different storage times (R2=0.71), indicating a change in fracture toughness and/or microhardness mechanisms. Conclusion. Fracture toughness of a composite cannot be simply extrapolated from microhardness.

AB - Objectives. Chipping and bulk fracture are major contributors in clinical failures of composite restorations. Fracture toughness (KIc) quantifies susceptibility for fracture, but experimental determination is complicated. It would be beneficial for the dental community if a relatively simple experiment, such as microhardness (HK), could be used to screen composites for fracture resistance. This study explores a possible correlation between KIc and HK. Methods. Composite cylinders (4mm diameter and ∼7mm long) were cured for five combinations of light intensity (I, mW/cm2) and curing time (T, s) to achieve a range of different total light energy densities (I×T=100×10, 100×20, 300×20, 300×40, and 700×60mWs/cm2). A chevron-notch was cut in the median plane of the cylinders for the fracture toughness test, which was executed in a displacement control mode at 6μm/s cross-head speed (sample size 4). Knoop hardness was determined at the median plane of the cylinders (sample size 6). The tests were performed 15min and 24h after curing. Results. Both the KIc and HK increased with increased light energy density and storage time. Linear regression analysis indicated a strong correlation between HK and KIc tested at the same time period (R2=0.97 and 0.90 for 15min and 24h, respectively). The correlation became weaker between the different storage times (R2=0.71), indicating a change in fracture toughness and/or microhardness mechanisms. Conclusion. Fracture toughness of a composite cannot be simply extrapolated from microhardness.

KW - Composite

KW - Fracture toughness

KW - Microhardness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038378476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038378476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00008-3

DO - 10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00008-3

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 89

EP - 95

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 2

ER -