Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement: A Rejoinder

Andrew D. Ho, Terry A. Ackerman, Deborah L. Bandalos, Derek C. Briggs, Howard T. Everson, Susan M. Lottridge, Matthew J. Madison, Sandip Sinharay, Michael C. Rodriguez, Michael Russell, Alina A. von Davier, Stefanie A. Wind

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

What are foundational competencies in educational measurement? We published a framework for these foundational competencies in this journal (Ackerman et al. 2024) and were grateful to receive eight commentaries raising a number of important questions about the framework and its implications. We identified five cross-cutting recommendations among the eight commentaries relating to (1) our process and purpose, (2) Artificial Intelligence, (3) ethical competencies, (4) qualitative, critical, and culturally responsive commentaries, and (5) intersecting professions in, for example, classroom assessment and content development. In this rejoinder, we respond to these five recommendations and to each of the eight commentaries in turn. We hope that discussion and consensus about foundational competencies in educational measurement continue to advance in our journals and our field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-63
Number of pages8
JournalEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the National Council on Measurement in Education.

Keywords

  • assessment
  • educational measurement
  • fairness
  • psychometrics
  • validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement: A Rejoinder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this