Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fossil footprints and what they mean for hominin paleobiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Hominin footprints have not traditionally played prominent roles in paleoanthropological studies, aside from the famous 3.66 Ma footprints discovered at Laetoli, Tanzania in the late 1970s. This contrasts with the importance of trace fossils (ichnology) in the broader field of paleontology. Lack of attention to hominin footprints can probably be explained by perceptions that these are exceptionally rare and “curiosities” rather than sources of data that yield insights on par with skeletal fossils or artifacts. In recent years, however, discoveries of hominin footprints have surged in frequency, shining important new light on anatomy, locomotion, behaviors, and environments from a wide variety of times and places. Here, we discuss why these data are often overlooked and consider whether they are as “rare” as previously assumed. We review new ways footprint data are being used to address questions about hominin paleobiology, and we outline key opportunities for future research in hominin ichnology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-53
Number of pages15
JournalEvolutionary anthropology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords

  • footprints
  • ichnology
  • paleoanthropology
  • trace fossils
  • tracks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fossil footprints and what they mean for hominin paleobiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this