Formal advocacy curricula in family medicine residencies: A cera survey of program directors

Anastasia J. Coutinho, Bich May Nguyen, Christina Kelly, Kenneth Lin, Alexandra Gits, Renee Crichlow, Gerardo Moreno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Health advocacy has been declared an essential physician skill in numerous professional physician charters. However, there is limited literature on whether, and how, family medicine residencies teach this skill. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of a formal mandatory advocacy curriculum among US family medicine residencies, barriers to implementation, and what characteristics might predict its presence. METHODS: Questions about residency advocacy curricula, residency characteristics, and program director (PD) attitudes toward family medicine and advocacy were included in the 2017 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of family medicine residency PDs. We used univariate and bivariate statistics to describe residency characteristics, PD attitudes, the presence of a formal advocacy curriculum, and the relationship between these. RESULTS: Of 478 PDs, 261 (54.6%) responded to the survey and 236/261 (90.4%) completed the full advocacy module. Just over one-third (37.7%, (89/236)) of residencies reported the presence of a mandatory formal advocacy curriculum, of which 86.7% (78/89) focused on community advocacy. The most common barrier was curricular flexibility. Having an advocacy curriculum was positively associated with faculty experience and optimistic PD attitudes toward advocacy. CONCLUSIONS: In a national survey of family medicine PDs, only one-third of responding PDs reported a mandatory advocacy curriculum, most focusing on community advocacy. The largest barrier to implementation was curricular flexibility. More research is needed to explore the best strategies to implement these types of curricula and the long-term impacts of formal training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-261
Number of pages7
JournalFamily medicine
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
FUNDING/SUPPORT DISCLOSURES: Dr Moreno received support from a National Institute on Aging (NIA; K23 AG042961-01) Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award, the American Federation for Aging Research, and from the UCLA Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research, Center for Health Improvement of Minority Elderly under National Institutes of Health (NIH)/NIA grant P30-AG021684. The content of this article does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIA or the NIH.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. All rights reserved.

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Formal advocacy curricula in family medicine residencies: A cera survey of program directors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this