Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome–Which is it?

Paul A. Arbisi

doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1365933

Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome–Which is it?

Paul A. Arbisi

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

A reflection on the exchange between Larrabee et al. (2017) and Nichols (2017) is provided by a clinical psychologist who co-authored an early critique questioning the validity of the FBS as a measure of over reporting and who, based on subsequent studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the FBS in identifying non-credible report of somatic and cognitive complaints, changed his opinion regarding the utility of the FBS/FBS-r as a symptom validity measure. Given the accumulated evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of the FBS/FBS-r as a symptom validity measure, reasons for the continued debate over the validity and utility of the FBS/FBS-r are discussed.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1406-1411
Number of pages	6
Journal	Clinical Neuropsychologist
Volume	31
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1365933
State	Published - Nov 17 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

FBS
commentary
reflection
validity

Publisher link

10.1080/13854046.2017.1365933

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome–Which is it?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Arbisi, P. A. (2017). Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome–Which is it? Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(8), 1406-1411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1365933

Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome–Which is it? / Arbisi, Paul A.
In: Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 31, No. 8, 17.11.2017, p. 1406-1411.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Arbisi, PA 2017, 'Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome–Which is it?', Clinical Neuropsychologist, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1406-1411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1365933

@article{2f450e2d833c4f9a87d250fa8ef58ae3,

title = "Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome{\textendash}Which is it?",

abstract = "A reflection on the exchange between Larrabee et al. (2017) and Nichols (2017) is provided by a clinical psychologist who co-authored an early critique questioning the validity of the FBS as a measure of over reporting and who, based on subsequent studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the FBS in identifying non-credible report of somatic and cognitive complaints, changed his opinion regarding the utility of the FBS/FBS-r as a symptom validity measure. Given the accumulated evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of the FBS/FBS-r as a symptom validity measure, reasons for the continued debate over the validity and utility of the FBS/FBS-r are discussed.",

keywords = "FBS, commentary, reflection, validity",

author = "Arbisi, \{Paul A.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \& Francis Group.",

year = "2017",

month = nov,

day = "17",

doi = "10.1080/13854046.2017.1365933",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "31",

pages = "1406--1411",

journal = "Clinical Neuropsychologist",

issn = "1385-4046",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Form vs Function, fighting the last war

T2 - a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome–Which is it?

AU - Arbisi, Paul A.

PY - 2017/11/17

Y1 - 2017/11/17

N2 - A reflection on the exchange between Larrabee et al. (2017) and Nichols (2017) is provided by a clinical psychologist who co-authored an early critique questioning the validity of the FBS as a measure of over reporting and who, based on subsequent studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the FBS in identifying non-credible report of somatic and cognitive complaints, changed his opinion regarding the utility of the FBS/FBS-r as a symptom validity measure. Given the accumulated evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of the FBS/FBS-r as a symptom validity measure, reasons for the continued debate over the validity and utility of the FBS/FBS-r are discussed.

AB - A reflection on the exchange between Larrabee et al. (2017) and Nichols (2017) is provided by a clinical psychologist who co-authored an early critique questioning the validity of the FBS as a measure of over reporting and who, based on subsequent studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the FBS in identifying non-credible report of somatic and cognitive complaints, changed his opinion regarding the utility of the FBS/FBS-r as a symptom validity measure. Given the accumulated evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of the FBS/FBS-r as a symptom validity measure, reasons for the continued debate over the validity and utility of the FBS/FBS-r are discussed.

KW - FBS

KW - commentary

KW - reflection

KW - validity

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85028551293

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85028551293#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1080/13854046.2017.1365933

DO - 10.1080/13854046.2017.1365933

M3 - Article

C2 - 28829250

AN - SCOPUS:85028551293

SN - 1385-4046

VL - 31

SP - 1406

EP - 1411

JO - Clinical Neuropsychologist

JF - Clinical Neuropsychologist

IS - 8

ER -

Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome–Which is it?

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this