For elective inductions at term, does cervical ripening with misoprostol result in shorter time to delivery than dinoprostone?

Joel Soma; Chee Lor; Sarah Roe; Kathryn Freeman

doi:10.1097/EBP.0000000000000900

For elective inductions at term, does cervical ripening with misoprostol result in shorter time to delivery than dinoprostone?

Joel Soma
, Chee Lor
, Sarah Roe
, Kathryn Freeman

Family Medicine and Community Health (Twin Cities)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	36-37
Number of pages	2
Journal	Evidence-Based Practice
Volume	23
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/EBP.0000000000000900
State	Published - Dec 1 2020

Publisher link

10.1097/EBP.0000000000000900

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{2ff98c24b4f54d1cbc43c89ed9557333,

title = "For elective inductions at term, does cervical ripening with misoprostol result in shorter time to delivery than dinoprostone?",

author = "Joel Soma and Chee Lor and Sarah Roe and Kathryn Freeman",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1097/EBP.0000000000000900",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "23",

pages = "36--37",

journal = "Evidence-Based Practice",

issn = "1095-4120",