Foker process for the correction of long gap esophageal atresia

Primary treatment versus secondary treatment after prior esophageal surgery

Sigrid Bairdain, Thomas E. Hamilton, Charles Jason Smithers, Michael Manfredi, Peter Ngo, Dorothy Gallagher, David Zurakowski, John E Foker, Russell W. Jennings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The Foker process (FP) uses tension-induced growth for primary esophageal reconstruction in patients with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). It has been less well described in LGEA patients who have undergone prior esophageal reconstruction attempts. Methods All cases of LGEA treated at our institution from January 2005 to April 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who initially had esophageal surgery elsewhere were considered secondary FP cases. Demographics, esophageal evaluations, and complications were collected. Median time to esophageal anastomosis and full oral nutrition was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards regression identified potential risk factors. Results Fifty-two patients were identified, including 27 primary versus 25 secondary FP patients. Median time to anastomosis was 14 days for primary and 35 days for secondary cases (p < 0.001). Secondary cases (p = 0.013) and number of thoracotomies (p < 0.001) were identified as significant predictors for achieving anastomosis and the development of a leak. Predictors of progression to full oral feeding were primary FP cases (O.R. = 17.0, 95% CI: 2.8-102, p < 0.001) and patients with longer follow-up (O.R. = 1.06/month, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.005). Conclusions The FP has been successful in repairing infants with primary LGEA, but the secondary LGEA patients proved to be more challenging to achieve a primary esophageal anastomosis. Early referral to a multidisciplinary esophageal center and a flexible approach to establish continuity in secondary patients is recommended. Given their complexity, larger studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and discern optimal strategies for reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)933-937
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Esophageal Atresia
Therapeutics
Thoracotomy
Referral and Consultation
Demography

Keywords

  • Esophageal atresia
  • Foker process
  • Secondary long-gap esophageal atresia patients

Cite this

Foker process for the correction of long gap esophageal atresia : Primary treatment versus secondary treatment after prior esophageal surgery. / Bairdain, Sigrid; Hamilton, Thomas E.; Smithers, Charles Jason; Manfredi, Michael; Ngo, Peter; Gallagher, Dorothy; Zurakowski, David; Foker, John E; Jennings, Russell W.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 50, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 933-937.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bairdain, Sigrid ; Hamilton, Thomas E. ; Smithers, Charles Jason ; Manfredi, Michael ; Ngo, Peter ; Gallagher, Dorothy ; Zurakowski, David ; Foker, John E ; Jennings, Russell W. / Foker process for the correction of long gap esophageal atresia : Primary treatment versus secondary treatment after prior esophageal surgery. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 933-937.
@article{74cf882714984a2f82a2a2d63bd657d1,
title = "Foker process for the correction of long gap esophageal atresia: Primary treatment versus secondary treatment after prior esophageal surgery",
abstract = "Purpose The Foker process (FP) uses tension-induced growth for primary esophageal reconstruction in patients with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). It has been less well described in LGEA patients who have undergone prior esophageal reconstruction attempts. Methods All cases of LGEA treated at our institution from January 2005 to April 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who initially had esophageal surgery elsewhere were considered secondary FP cases. Demographics, esophageal evaluations, and complications were collected. Median time to esophageal anastomosis and full oral nutrition was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards regression identified potential risk factors. Results Fifty-two patients were identified, including 27 primary versus 25 secondary FP patients. Median time to anastomosis was 14 days for primary and 35 days for secondary cases (p < 0.001). Secondary cases (p = 0.013) and number of thoracotomies (p < 0.001) were identified as significant predictors for achieving anastomosis and the development of a leak. Predictors of progression to full oral feeding were primary FP cases (O.R. = 17.0, 95{\%} CI: 2.8-102, p < 0.001) and patients with longer follow-up (O.R. = 1.06/month, 95{\%} CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.005). Conclusions The FP has been successful in repairing infants with primary LGEA, but the secondary LGEA patients proved to be more challenging to achieve a primary esophageal anastomosis. Early referral to a multidisciplinary esophageal center and a flexible approach to establish continuity in secondary patients is recommended. Given their complexity, larger studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and discern optimal strategies for reconstruction.",
keywords = "Esophageal atresia, Foker process, Secondary long-gap esophageal atresia patients",
author = "Sigrid Bairdain and Hamilton, {Thomas E.} and Smithers, {Charles Jason} and Michael Manfredi and Peter Ngo and Dorothy Gallagher and David Zurakowski and Foker, {John E} and Jennings, {Russell W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "933--937",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Foker process for the correction of long gap esophageal atresia

T2 - Primary treatment versus secondary treatment after prior esophageal surgery

AU - Bairdain, Sigrid

AU - Hamilton, Thomas E.

AU - Smithers, Charles Jason

AU - Manfredi, Michael

AU - Ngo, Peter

AU - Gallagher, Dorothy

AU - Zurakowski, David

AU - Foker, John E

AU - Jennings, Russell W.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Purpose The Foker process (FP) uses tension-induced growth for primary esophageal reconstruction in patients with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). It has been less well described in LGEA patients who have undergone prior esophageal reconstruction attempts. Methods All cases of LGEA treated at our institution from January 2005 to April 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who initially had esophageal surgery elsewhere were considered secondary FP cases. Demographics, esophageal evaluations, and complications were collected. Median time to esophageal anastomosis and full oral nutrition was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards regression identified potential risk factors. Results Fifty-two patients were identified, including 27 primary versus 25 secondary FP patients. Median time to anastomosis was 14 days for primary and 35 days for secondary cases (p < 0.001). Secondary cases (p = 0.013) and number of thoracotomies (p < 0.001) were identified as significant predictors for achieving anastomosis and the development of a leak. Predictors of progression to full oral feeding were primary FP cases (O.R. = 17.0, 95% CI: 2.8-102, p < 0.001) and patients with longer follow-up (O.R. = 1.06/month, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.005). Conclusions The FP has been successful in repairing infants with primary LGEA, but the secondary LGEA patients proved to be more challenging to achieve a primary esophageal anastomosis. Early referral to a multidisciplinary esophageal center and a flexible approach to establish continuity in secondary patients is recommended. Given their complexity, larger studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and discern optimal strategies for reconstruction.

AB - Purpose The Foker process (FP) uses tension-induced growth for primary esophageal reconstruction in patients with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). It has been less well described in LGEA patients who have undergone prior esophageal reconstruction attempts. Methods All cases of LGEA treated at our institution from January 2005 to April 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who initially had esophageal surgery elsewhere were considered secondary FP cases. Demographics, esophageal evaluations, and complications were collected. Median time to esophageal anastomosis and full oral nutrition was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards regression identified potential risk factors. Results Fifty-two patients were identified, including 27 primary versus 25 secondary FP patients. Median time to anastomosis was 14 days for primary and 35 days for secondary cases (p < 0.001). Secondary cases (p = 0.013) and number of thoracotomies (p < 0.001) were identified as significant predictors for achieving anastomosis and the development of a leak. Predictors of progression to full oral feeding were primary FP cases (O.R. = 17.0, 95% CI: 2.8-102, p < 0.001) and patients with longer follow-up (O.R. = 1.06/month, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.005). Conclusions The FP has been successful in repairing infants with primary LGEA, but the secondary LGEA patients proved to be more challenging to achieve a primary esophageal anastomosis. Early referral to a multidisciplinary esophageal center and a flexible approach to establish continuity in secondary patients is recommended. Given their complexity, larger studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and discern optimal strategies for reconstruction.

KW - Esophageal atresia

KW - Foker process

KW - Secondary long-gap esophageal atresia patients

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929506283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929506283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.010

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 933

EP - 937

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 6

ER -