First-order logic theory for manipulating clinical practice guidelines applied to comorbid patients: a case study

Martin Michalowski, Szymon Wilk, Xing Tan, Wojtek Michalowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) implement evidence-based medicine designed to help generate a therapy for a patient suffering from a single disease. When applied to a comorbid patient, the concurrent combination of treatment steps from multiple CPGs is susceptible to adverse interactions in the resulting combined therapy (i.e., a therapy established according to all considered CPGs). This inability to concurrently apply CPGs has been shown to be one of the key shortcomings of CPG uptake in a clinical setting1. Several research efforts are underway to address this issue such as the K4CARE2 and GuideLine INteraction Detection Assistant (GLINDA)3 projects and our previous research on applying constraint logic programming to developing a consistent combined therapy for a comorbid patient4. However, there is no generalized framework for mitigation that effectively captures general characteristics of the problem while handling nuances such as time and ordering requirements imposed by specific CPGs. In this paper we propose a first-order logic-based (FOL) approach for developing a generalized framework of mitigation. This approach uses a meta-algorithm and entailment properties to mitigate (i.e., identify and address) adverse interactions introduced by concurrently applied CPGs. We use an illustrative case study of a patient suffering from type 2 diabetes being treated for an onset of severe rheumatoid arthritis to show the expressiveness and robustness of our proposed FOL-based approach, and we discuss its appropriateness as the basis for the generalized theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)892-898
Number of pages7
JournalAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
Volume2014
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Therapeutics
Evidence-Based Medicine
Research
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Guidelines

Cite this

First-order logic theory for manipulating clinical practice guidelines applied to comorbid patients : a case study. / Michalowski, Martin; Wilk, Szymon; Tan, Xing; Michalowski, Wojtek.

In: AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium, Vol. 2014, 01.01.2014, p. 892-898.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71d9881d77eb4de68abef6d958693e67,
title = "First-order logic theory for manipulating clinical practice guidelines applied to comorbid patients: a case study",
abstract = "Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) implement evidence-based medicine designed to help generate a therapy for a patient suffering from a single disease. When applied to a comorbid patient, the concurrent combination of treatment steps from multiple CPGs is susceptible to adverse interactions in the resulting combined therapy (i.e., a therapy established according to all considered CPGs). This inability to concurrently apply CPGs has been shown to be one of the key shortcomings of CPG uptake in a clinical setting1. Several research efforts are underway to address this issue such as the K4CARE2 and GuideLine INteraction Detection Assistant (GLINDA)3 projects and our previous research on applying constraint logic programming to developing a consistent combined therapy for a comorbid patient4. However, there is no generalized framework for mitigation that effectively captures general characteristics of the problem while handling nuances such as time and ordering requirements imposed by specific CPGs. In this paper we propose a first-order logic-based (FOL) approach for developing a generalized framework of mitigation. This approach uses a meta-algorithm and entailment properties to mitigate (i.e., identify and address) adverse interactions introduced by concurrently applied CPGs. We use an illustrative case study of a patient suffering from type 2 diabetes being treated for an onset of severe rheumatoid arthritis to show the expressiveness and robustness of our proposed FOL-based approach, and we discuss its appropriateness as the basis for the generalized theory.",
author = "Martin Michalowski and Szymon Wilk and Xing Tan and Wojtek Michalowski",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2014",
pages = "892--898",
journal = "AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium",
issn = "1559-4076",
publisher = "American Medical Informatics Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - First-order logic theory for manipulating clinical practice guidelines applied to comorbid patients

T2 - a case study

AU - Michalowski, Martin

AU - Wilk, Szymon

AU - Tan, Xing

AU - Michalowski, Wojtek

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) implement evidence-based medicine designed to help generate a therapy for a patient suffering from a single disease. When applied to a comorbid patient, the concurrent combination of treatment steps from multiple CPGs is susceptible to adverse interactions in the resulting combined therapy (i.e., a therapy established according to all considered CPGs). This inability to concurrently apply CPGs has been shown to be one of the key shortcomings of CPG uptake in a clinical setting1. Several research efforts are underway to address this issue such as the K4CARE2 and GuideLine INteraction Detection Assistant (GLINDA)3 projects and our previous research on applying constraint logic programming to developing a consistent combined therapy for a comorbid patient4. However, there is no generalized framework for mitigation that effectively captures general characteristics of the problem while handling nuances such as time and ordering requirements imposed by specific CPGs. In this paper we propose a first-order logic-based (FOL) approach for developing a generalized framework of mitigation. This approach uses a meta-algorithm and entailment properties to mitigate (i.e., identify and address) adverse interactions introduced by concurrently applied CPGs. We use an illustrative case study of a patient suffering from type 2 diabetes being treated for an onset of severe rheumatoid arthritis to show the expressiveness and robustness of our proposed FOL-based approach, and we discuss its appropriateness as the basis for the generalized theory.

AB - Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) implement evidence-based medicine designed to help generate a therapy for a patient suffering from a single disease. When applied to a comorbid patient, the concurrent combination of treatment steps from multiple CPGs is susceptible to adverse interactions in the resulting combined therapy (i.e., a therapy established according to all considered CPGs). This inability to concurrently apply CPGs has been shown to be one of the key shortcomings of CPG uptake in a clinical setting1. Several research efforts are underway to address this issue such as the K4CARE2 and GuideLine INteraction Detection Assistant (GLINDA)3 projects and our previous research on applying constraint logic programming to developing a consistent combined therapy for a comorbid patient4. However, there is no generalized framework for mitigation that effectively captures general characteristics of the problem while handling nuances such as time and ordering requirements imposed by specific CPGs. In this paper we propose a first-order logic-based (FOL) approach for developing a generalized framework of mitigation. This approach uses a meta-algorithm and entailment properties to mitigate (i.e., identify and address) adverse interactions introduced by concurrently applied CPGs. We use an illustrative case study of a patient suffering from type 2 diabetes being treated for an onset of severe rheumatoid arthritis to show the expressiveness and robustness of our proposed FOL-based approach, and we discuss its appropriateness as the basis for the generalized theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964315124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964315124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25954396

AN - SCOPUS:84964315124

VL - 2014

SP - 892

EP - 898

JO - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

JF - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

SN - 1559-4076

ER -