Abstract
This study asks why hospitals provide direct financial support to nursing schools and faculty. This support is striking because nursing education is clearly general, clearly paid by the firm, and information asymmetries appear minimal. Using AHA and survey data, I find hospitals employing a greater share of their MSA's registered nurses are more likely to provide direct financial support to nursing schools and faculty, net of size and other institutional controls. Given the institutional context, I interpret this result as unusually specific evidence that technologically general skill training may be made de facto-specific by imperfect and costly mobility.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 149-159 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Health Economics |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Firm-sponsored general education
- Labor Mobility
- Monopsony and labor market segmentation
- Nursing Manpower and Shortages
- Training and education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Firm-sponsored general education and mobility frictions: Evidence from hospital sponsorship of nursing schools and faculty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS