Abstract
In using finite difference techniques for solving diffusion/ convection controlled solidification processes, the numerical discretization is commonly carried out in one of two ways: (1) transformed grid, in which case the physical space is transformed into a solution space that can be discretized with a fixed grid in space; (2) fixed grid, in which case the physical space is discretized with a fixed uniform orthogonal grid and the effects of the phase change are accounted for on the definition of suitable source terms. In this paper, recently proposed transformed- and fixed-grid methods are outlined. The two methods are evaluated based on solving a problem involving the melting of gallium. Comparisons are made between the predictive power of the two methods to resolve the position of the moving phase-change front.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 25-41 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1990 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Marcel Lacroix acknowledges the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Vaughan Voller acknowledges the support of Alcan Research during this study,
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Finite difference solutions of solidification phase change problems: Transformed versus fixed grids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS