Findings follow framings: Navigating the empirical turn

Thomas J. Misa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


In this paper, I outline several methodological questions that we need to confront. The chief question is how can we identify the nature of technological change and its varied cultural consequences-including social, political, institutional, and economic dimensions-when our different research methods, using distinct 'levels' or 'scales' of analysis, yield contradictory results. What can we say, in other words, when our findings about technology follow from the framings of our inquiries? In slightly different terms, can we combine insights from the fine-grained "social shaping of technology" as well as from complementary approaches accenting the "technological shaping of society?" As a way forward, I will suggest conducting multi-scale inquiries into the processes of technological and cultural change. This will involve recognizing and conceptualizing the analytical scales or levels on which we conduct inquiry (very roughly, micro, meso, macro) as well as outlining strategies for moving within and between these scales or levels. Of course we want and need diverse methodologies for analyzing technology and culture. I find myself in sympathy with geographer Brenner (New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood, 2004, p. 7), who aspires to a "theoretically precise yet also historically specific conceptualization of [technological change] as a key dimension of social, political and economic life."

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-375
Number of pages19
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2009


  • Agency-structure problem
  • Historiography of technology
  • Scale
  • Social constructivism


Dive into the research topics of 'Findings follow framings: Navigating the empirical turn'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this