Finding our way: On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia

Hamish A. Campbell, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Todd E. Dennis, Ross G. Dwyer, James D. Forester, Yusuke Fukuda, Catherine Lynch, Mark A. Hindell, Norbert Menke, Juan M. Morales, Craig Richardson, Essie Rodgers, Graeme Taylor, Matt E. Watts, David A. Westcott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~. 500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-84
Number of pages6
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume534
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2015

Fingerprint

Telemetering
telemetry
Animals
animal
freshwater ecosystem
tagging
Natural resources
resource
Cost effectiveness
survivorship
terrestrial ecosystem
marine ecosystem
Ecosystems
Managers
Monitoring
monitoring
cost

Keywords

  • ARGOS
  • Biotelemetry
  • GPS
  • Inter-disciplinary
  • Movement ecology
  • Wildlife tracking

Cite this

Finding our way : On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia. / Campbell, Hamish A.; Beyer, Hawthorne L.; Dennis, Todd E.; Dwyer, Ross G.; Forester, James D.; Fukuda, Yusuke; Lynch, Catherine; Hindell, Mark A.; Menke, Norbert; Morales, Juan M.; Richardson, Craig; Rodgers, Essie; Taylor, Graeme; Watts, Matt E.; Westcott, David A.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 534, 15.11.2015, p. 79-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Campbell, HA, Beyer, HL, Dennis, TE, Dwyer, RG, Forester, JD, Fukuda, Y, Lynch, C, Hindell, MA, Menke, N, Morales, JM, Richardson, C, Rodgers, E, Taylor, G, Watts, ME & Westcott, DA 2015, 'Finding our way: On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 534, pp. 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.089
Campbell, Hamish A. ; Beyer, Hawthorne L. ; Dennis, Todd E. ; Dwyer, Ross G. ; Forester, James D. ; Fukuda, Yusuke ; Lynch, Catherine ; Hindell, Mark A. ; Menke, Norbert ; Morales, Juan M. ; Richardson, Craig ; Rodgers, Essie ; Taylor, Graeme ; Watts, Matt E. ; Westcott, David A. / Finding our way : On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2015 ; Vol. 534. pp. 79-84.
@article{76e62e0fc4ae4f4d919d325329e7bcc0,
title = "Finding our way: On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia",
abstract = "The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~. 500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8{\%} of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.",
keywords = "ARGOS, Biotelemetry, GPS, Inter-disciplinary, Movement ecology, Wildlife tracking",
author = "Campbell, {Hamish A.} and Beyer, {Hawthorne L.} and Dennis, {Todd E.} and Dwyer, {Ross G.} and Forester, {James D.} and Yusuke Fukuda and Catherine Lynch and Hindell, {Mark A.} and Norbert Menke and Morales, {Juan M.} and Craig Richardson and Essie Rodgers and Graeme Taylor and Watts, {Matt E.} and Westcott, {David A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.089",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "534",
pages = "79--84",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finding our way

T2 - On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia

AU - Campbell, Hamish A.

AU - Beyer, Hawthorne L.

AU - Dennis, Todd E.

AU - Dwyer, Ross G.

AU - Forester, James D.

AU - Fukuda, Yusuke

AU - Lynch, Catherine

AU - Hindell, Mark A.

AU - Menke, Norbert

AU - Morales, Juan M.

AU - Richardson, Craig

AU - Rodgers, Essie

AU - Taylor, Graeme

AU - Watts, Matt E.

AU - Westcott, David A.

PY - 2015/11/15

Y1 - 2015/11/15

N2 - The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~. 500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.

AB - The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~. 500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.

KW - ARGOS

KW - Biotelemetry

KW - GPS

KW - Inter-disciplinary

KW - Movement ecology

KW - Wildlife tracking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940438419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940438419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.089

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.089

M3 - Article

C2 - 25669144

AN - SCOPUS:84940438419

VL - 534

SP - 79

EP - 84

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -