Abstract
This paper evaluates the ability of the trend-cycle decomposition approach of Hamilton (2018. "Why You Should Never Use the Hodrick-Prescott Filter."The Review of Economics and Statistics 100 (5): 831-43) to adequately characterize linear and (a)symmetric nonlinear business cycles fluctuations that are known to be persistent. This ability is contrasted to that of the Hodrick-Prescott filter. By means of Monte Carlo simulations, the results indicate that neither filter is able to preserve the cyclical properties of the data-generating process nor reproduce U.S. business cycles features, although this inability is exacerbated for the decomposition of Hamilton (2018. "Why You Should Never Use the Hodrick-Prescott Filter."The Review of Economics and Statistics 100 (5): 831-43). Based on these findings, caution is called into question when this approach is applied to linear or nonlinear processes that are thought to exhibit persistence.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 473-495 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 2022.
Keywords
- Markov-switching
- asymmetry
- business cycles
- detrending
- persistence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Filtering Persistent and Asymmetric Cycles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS