Feminist political economy in geography: Why now, what is different, and what for?

Marion Werner, Kendra Strauss, Brenda Parker, Reecia Orzeck, Kate Derickson, Anne Bonds

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Feminist scholarship is proliferating at the margins of political, urban, and economic geography and migrating to the (somewhat amorphous) centers of these sub-disciplines. In this intervention, we associate this ‘feminist upsurge’ with the desire to reconsider economic geographers’ theoretical and conceptual toolkits in the face of multi-dimensional crises. We undertake a collective effort to think through this upsurge from our respective commitments to feminist political economy (FPE). We organize our reflections on FPE in geography around three key questions. First, how are the tools of feminist political economic analysis useful for tackling the urgent questions the current conjuncture presents? In other words, why now? Second, what are the lines of continuity and difference marking current FPE analysis in geography from past interventions? As is often the case with geography's ‘turns’, there is a danger that the longer history (and more tangled genealogy) of critical approaches gets swept aside in the tide of the new. We ask what is, and is not, different about the contemporary conjuncture to which FPE is responding and the way in which it responds? Third, our aim is not solely to understand more accurately how difference matters to capitalism. We conclude by asking to what end do we mobilize feminist political economy? Or, simply, what for?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages4
JournalGeoforum
Volume79
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

political economy
geography
theoretical economics
urban geography
economic geography
genealogy
capitalist society
continuity
commitment
history
economics

Keywords

  • Conjunctural analysis
  • Critical race theory
  • Economic geography
  • Feminist geography
  • Feminist political economy
  • Praxis

Cite this

Feminist political economy in geography : Why now, what is different, and what for? / Werner, Marion; Strauss, Kendra; Parker, Brenda; Orzeck, Reecia; Derickson, Kate; Bonds, Anne.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 79, 01.02.2017, p. 1-4.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Werner, Marion ; Strauss, Kendra ; Parker, Brenda ; Orzeck, Reecia ; Derickson, Kate ; Bonds, Anne. / Feminist political economy in geography : Why now, what is different, and what for?. In: Geoforum. 2017 ; Vol. 79. pp. 1-4.
@article{d9b46f8b6b4f4c82b249205ab44056d8,
title = "Feminist political economy in geography: Why now, what is different, and what for?",
abstract = "Feminist scholarship is proliferating at the margins of political, urban, and economic geography and migrating to the (somewhat amorphous) centers of these sub-disciplines. In this intervention, we associate this ‘feminist upsurge’ with the desire to reconsider economic geographers’ theoretical and conceptual toolkits in the face of multi-dimensional crises. We undertake a collective effort to think through this upsurge from our respective commitments to feminist political economy (FPE). We organize our reflections on FPE in geography around three key questions. First, how are the tools of feminist political economic analysis useful for tackling the urgent questions the current conjuncture presents? In other words, why now? Second, what are the lines of continuity and difference marking current FPE analysis in geography from past interventions? As is often the case with geography's ‘turns’, there is a danger that the longer history (and more tangled genealogy) of critical approaches gets swept aside in the tide of the new. We ask what is, and is not, different about the contemporary conjuncture to which FPE is responding and the way in which it responds? Third, our aim is not solely to understand more accurately how difference matters to capitalism. We conclude by asking to what end do we mobilize feminist political economy? Or, simply, what for?",
keywords = "Conjunctural analysis, Critical race theory, Economic geography, Feminist geography, Feminist political economy, Praxis",
author = "Marion Werner and Kendra Strauss and Brenda Parker and Reecia Orzeck and Kate Derickson and Anne Bonds",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "1--4",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feminist political economy in geography

T2 - Why now, what is different, and what for?

AU - Werner, Marion

AU - Strauss, Kendra

AU - Parker, Brenda

AU - Orzeck, Reecia

AU - Derickson, Kate

AU - Bonds, Anne

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Feminist scholarship is proliferating at the margins of political, urban, and economic geography and migrating to the (somewhat amorphous) centers of these sub-disciplines. In this intervention, we associate this ‘feminist upsurge’ with the desire to reconsider economic geographers’ theoretical and conceptual toolkits in the face of multi-dimensional crises. We undertake a collective effort to think through this upsurge from our respective commitments to feminist political economy (FPE). We organize our reflections on FPE in geography around three key questions. First, how are the tools of feminist political economic analysis useful for tackling the urgent questions the current conjuncture presents? In other words, why now? Second, what are the lines of continuity and difference marking current FPE analysis in geography from past interventions? As is often the case with geography's ‘turns’, there is a danger that the longer history (and more tangled genealogy) of critical approaches gets swept aside in the tide of the new. We ask what is, and is not, different about the contemporary conjuncture to which FPE is responding and the way in which it responds? Third, our aim is not solely to understand more accurately how difference matters to capitalism. We conclude by asking to what end do we mobilize feminist political economy? Or, simply, what for?

AB - Feminist scholarship is proliferating at the margins of political, urban, and economic geography and migrating to the (somewhat amorphous) centers of these sub-disciplines. In this intervention, we associate this ‘feminist upsurge’ with the desire to reconsider economic geographers’ theoretical and conceptual toolkits in the face of multi-dimensional crises. We undertake a collective effort to think through this upsurge from our respective commitments to feminist political economy (FPE). We organize our reflections on FPE in geography around three key questions. First, how are the tools of feminist political economic analysis useful for tackling the urgent questions the current conjuncture presents? In other words, why now? Second, what are the lines of continuity and difference marking current FPE analysis in geography from past interventions? As is often the case with geography's ‘turns’, there is a danger that the longer history (and more tangled genealogy) of critical approaches gets swept aside in the tide of the new. We ask what is, and is not, different about the contemporary conjuncture to which FPE is responding and the way in which it responds? Third, our aim is not solely to understand more accurately how difference matters to capitalism. We conclude by asking to what end do we mobilize feminist political economy? Or, simply, what for?

KW - Conjunctural analysis

KW - Critical race theory

KW - Economic geography

KW - Feminist geography

KW - Feminist political economy

KW - Praxis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007579396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007579396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.013

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.013

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85007579396

VL - 79

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -