Feminist Matters: The Politics of Eating in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's Purple Hibiscus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Using food as a narrative device in her critically acclaimed debut novel Purple Hibiscus (2003), Adichie offers a markedly feminist critique of the legacies of neocolonialism on Africa's ability to choose its own destiny. Indeed, Adichie's exploration of food as the locus of hospitality and hostility and the dining table as a fraught and shifting site of power and its contestation yields a commentary on the domestic arena as a metaphor for the national sociopolitical and economic situation. More specifically, Adichie links notions of food control and tyrannical power to prevailing patriarchal systems that expose women and children to violent injustices and to material and spiritual want. She depicts colonial and fundamentalist religious institutions as inimical to women's participation in political and economic processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-316
Number of pages18
JournalContemporary Women's Writing
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site - for further information please contact [email protected].

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feminist Matters: The Politics of Eating in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's Purple Hibiscus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this