Abstract
Feminist communication scholars often adopt seemingly incommensurate stances to navigate tensions among agency, discourse, materiality, and history. I argue that valuing these "contradictions" is a hallmark of feminist communication research, a tradition I label feminist dilemmatic theorizing. Because feminists seek to describe and transform the world, they employ constitutive and representative understandings of communication. Rather than assert these approaches as paradoxical, I reread existing scholarship for nascent feminist new materialisms. Using sexual violence as an example, I argue that feminist communication theory develops a distinct approach to the force of communication, one in which discourse is not all-powerful. Accordingly, I suggest communication theorists draw upon existing feminist scholarship to meet critiques of social construction and develop a material turn.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 150-170 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Communication Theory |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 International Communication Association.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Agency
- Discourse
- Feminist theory
- New materialism
- Social construction
- Violence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Feminist Dilemmatic Theorizing: New Materialism in Communication Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS