Abstract
Feminist communication scholars often adopt seemingly incommensurate stances to navigate tensions among agency, discourse, materiality, and history. I argue that valuing these "contradictions" is a hallmark of feminist communication research, a tradition I label feminist dilemmatic theorizing. Because feminists seek to describe and transform the world, they employ constitutive and representative understandings of communication. Rather than assert these approaches as paradoxical, I reread existing scholarship for nascent feminist new materialisms. Using sexual violence as an example, I argue that feminist communication theory develops a distinct approach to the force of communication, one in which discourse is not all-powerful. Accordingly, I suggest communication theorists draw upon existing feminist scholarship to meet critiques of social construction and develop a material turn.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 150-170 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Communication Theory |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 International Communication Association.
Keywords
- Agency
- Discourse
- Feminist theory
- New materialism
- Social construction
- Violence