FATTENIN' FROGS FOR SNAKES? COMPANY INVESTMENTS IN JOB SKILLS TRAINING

David Knoke, Song Yang

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Human capital theory hypothesizes that no firm rationally invests in general job skills training because its competitors might hire the trained employees away before the firm could recoup its costs through higher worker productivity. Drawing from four explanatory perspectives, we developed several research hypotheses about the organizational and environmental sources of variation in company-provided job skills training for core employees, which we tested with a national sample of U.S. work establishments. Contrary to human capital theory expectations, the large majority of employers with core training programs reported providing skills that were either "to a great deal" or "to some extent" useful to other employers. Our general skills training analysis supported only one hypothesis, suggesting the inadequacy of human capital theory for explaining company training investments. We found evidence that the substantive contents of company job skills training programs differentiated into technical skills and social skills dimensions. Multivariate equations supported several hypothesized effects of organizational and environmental factors on the social and technical skills contents of company core training investments. We conclude with a reassessment of the classic general-specific job skills hypothesis and speculate about future directions for job skills training theory and research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Sociology of Job Training
Pages3-30
Number of pages28
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

Publication series

NameResearch in the Sociology of Work
Volume12
ISSN (Print)0277-2833

Fingerprint

human capital
training program
employer
employee
firm
environmental factors
productivity
worker
costs
evidence

Cite this

Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2003). FATTENIN' FROGS FOR SNAKES? COMPANY INVESTMENTS IN JOB SKILLS TRAINING. In The Sociology of Job Training (pp. 3-30). (Research in the Sociology of Work; Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-2833(03)12001-8

FATTENIN' FROGS FOR SNAKES? COMPANY INVESTMENTS IN JOB SKILLS TRAINING. / Knoke, David; Yang, Song.

The Sociology of Job Training. 2003. p. 3-30 (Research in the Sociology of Work; Vol. 12).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Knoke, D & Yang, S 2003, FATTENIN' FROGS FOR SNAKES? COMPANY INVESTMENTS IN JOB SKILLS TRAINING. in The Sociology of Job Training. Research in the Sociology of Work, vol. 12, pp. 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-2833(03)12001-8
Knoke D, Yang S. FATTENIN' FROGS FOR SNAKES? COMPANY INVESTMENTS IN JOB SKILLS TRAINING. In The Sociology of Job Training. 2003. p. 3-30. (Research in the Sociology of Work). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-2833(03)12001-8
Knoke, David ; Yang, Song. / FATTENIN' FROGS FOR SNAKES? COMPANY INVESTMENTS IN JOB SKILLS TRAINING. The Sociology of Job Training. 2003. pp. 3-30 (Research in the Sociology of Work).
@inbook{588479856b294df88cae91cae00400f1,
title = "FATTENIN' FROGS FOR SNAKES? COMPANY INVESTMENTS IN JOB SKILLS TRAINING",
abstract = "Human capital theory hypothesizes that no firm rationally invests in general job skills training because its competitors might hire the trained employees away before the firm could recoup its costs through higher worker productivity. Drawing from four explanatory perspectives, we developed several research hypotheses about the organizational and environmental sources of variation in company-provided job skills training for core employees, which we tested with a national sample of U.S. work establishments. Contrary to human capital theory expectations, the large majority of employers with core training programs reported providing skills that were either {"}to a great deal{"} or {"}to some extent{"} useful to other employers. Our general skills training analysis supported only one hypothesis, suggesting the inadequacy of human capital theory for explaining company training investments. We found evidence that the substantive contents of company job skills training programs differentiated into technical skills and social skills dimensions. Multivariate equations supported several hypothesized effects of organizational and environmental factors on the social and technical skills contents of company core training investments. We conclude with a reassessment of the classic general-specific job skills hypothesis and speculate about future directions for job skills training theory and research.",
author = "David Knoke and Song Yang",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0277-2833(03)12001-8",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0762308869",
series = "Research in the Sociology of Work",
pages = "3--30",
booktitle = "The Sociology of Job Training",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - FATTENIN' FROGS FOR SNAKES? COMPANY INVESTMENTS IN JOB SKILLS TRAINING

AU - Knoke, David

AU - Yang, Song

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - Human capital theory hypothesizes that no firm rationally invests in general job skills training because its competitors might hire the trained employees away before the firm could recoup its costs through higher worker productivity. Drawing from four explanatory perspectives, we developed several research hypotheses about the organizational and environmental sources of variation in company-provided job skills training for core employees, which we tested with a national sample of U.S. work establishments. Contrary to human capital theory expectations, the large majority of employers with core training programs reported providing skills that were either "to a great deal" or "to some extent" useful to other employers. Our general skills training analysis supported only one hypothesis, suggesting the inadequacy of human capital theory for explaining company training investments. We found evidence that the substantive contents of company job skills training programs differentiated into technical skills and social skills dimensions. Multivariate equations supported several hypothesized effects of organizational and environmental factors on the social and technical skills contents of company core training investments. We conclude with a reassessment of the classic general-specific job skills hypothesis and speculate about future directions for job skills training theory and research.

AB - Human capital theory hypothesizes that no firm rationally invests in general job skills training because its competitors might hire the trained employees away before the firm could recoup its costs through higher worker productivity. Drawing from four explanatory perspectives, we developed several research hypotheses about the organizational and environmental sources of variation in company-provided job skills training for core employees, which we tested with a national sample of U.S. work establishments. Contrary to human capital theory expectations, the large majority of employers with core training programs reported providing skills that were either "to a great deal" or "to some extent" useful to other employers. Our general skills training analysis supported only one hypothesis, suggesting the inadequacy of human capital theory for explaining company training investments. We found evidence that the substantive contents of company job skills training programs differentiated into technical skills and social skills dimensions. Multivariate equations supported several hypothesized effects of organizational and environmental factors on the social and technical skills contents of company core training investments. We conclude with a reassessment of the classic general-specific job skills hypothesis and speculate about future directions for job skills training theory and research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749418698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749418698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0277-2833(03)12001-8

DO - 10.1016/S0277-2833(03)12001-8

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:33749418698

SN - 0762308869

SN - 9780762308866

T3 - Research in the Sociology of Work

SP - 3

EP - 30

BT - The Sociology of Job Training

ER -