TY - JOUR
T1 - Family Forest Landowners’ Interest in Forest Carbon Offset Programs
T2 - Focus Group Findings from the Lake States, USA
AU - Miller, Kristell A.
AU - Snyder, Stephanie A.
AU - Kilgore, Mike A.
AU - Davenport, Mae A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2014/11/15
Y1 - 2014/11/15
N2 - In 2012, focus groups were organized with individuals owning 20+ acres in the Lake States region of the United States (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) to discuss various issues related to forest carbon offsetting. Focus group participants consisted of landowners who had responded to an earlier mail-back survey (2010) on forest carbon offsets. Two focus groups were held per state with an average of eight participants each (49 total). While landowner participant types varied, overall convergence was reached on several key issues. In general, discussion results found that the current payment amounts offered for carbon credits are not likely, on their own, to encourage participation in carbon markets. Landowners are most interested in other benefits they can attain through carbon management (e.g., improved stand species mix, wildlife, and trails). Interestingly, landowner perceptions about the condition of their own forest land were most indicative of prospective interest in carbon management. Landowners who felt that their forest was currently in poor condition, or did not meet their forest ownership objectives, were most interested in participating. While the initial survey sought landowner opinions about carbon markets, a majority of focus group participants expressed interest in general carbon management as a means to achieve reduced property taxes.
AB - In 2012, focus groups were organized with individuals owning 20+ acres in the Lake States region of the United States (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) to discuss various issues related to forest carbon offsetting. Focus group participants consisted of landowners who had responded to an earlier mail-back survey (2010) on forest carbon offsets. Two focus groups were held per state with an average of eight participants each (49 total). While landowner participant types varied, overall convergence was reached on several key issues. In general, discussion results found that the current payment amounts offered for carbon credits are not likely, on their own, to encourage participation in carbon markets. Landowners are most interested in other benefits they can attain through carbon management (e.g., improved stand species mix, wildlife, and trails). Interestingly, landowner perceptions about the condition of their own forest land were most indicative of prospective interest in carbon management. Landowners who felt that their forest was currently in poor condition, or did not meet their forest ownership objectives, were most interested in participating. While the initial survey sought landowner opinions about carbon markets, a majority of focus group participants expressed interest in general carbon management as a means to achieve reduced property taxes.
KW - Carbon management
KW - Family forest owners
KW - Focus groups
KW - Forest carbon offsets
KW - Lake states
KW - Voluntary carbon markets
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911365316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911365316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00267-014-0352-5
DO - 10.1007/s00267-014-0352-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 25148783
AN - SCOPUS:84911365316
SN - 0364-152X
VL - 54
SP - 1399
EP - 1411
JO - Environmental management
JF - Environmental management
IS - 6
ER -