Abstract
The paper challenges a minimalist strategy in business ethics that maintains "if it's legal, it's moral." In hard cases, judges decide legal issues by appealing to moral ideals. Investigation shows that the bedrock concept is fairness. Often judges define fairness in terms of non-coerciveness or equality of bargaining power. The prudent manager must look beyond the legal department to the ethical notion of fairness. Moreover, if the courts were to consistently appeal to non-coerciveness and equality of bargaining power, some practices now considered morally acceptable would be neither moral nor legal.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 89-98 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Business Ethics |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1988 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fair markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS