Abstract
Despite encouraging findings that show that interventions can improve students’ math understanding, achievement gaps in math often persist or even widen for students who struggle. Practitioners play a significant role in closing these achievement gaps because they have the responsibility to select or design interventions. Practitioners may wish to consider factors that influence intervention effectiveness. This study evaluated numeracy interventions and explored how features of the studies and interventions may have influenced reported effects. Exploratory analyses revealed smaller effects when only distal measures were considered (g = 0.35; SE = 0.05), or when studies reported including more than 30 percent of participants as English learners (g = 0.44; SE = 0.12). Results also indicated variable effects across the same intervention programs. Implications for practitioners related to selecting interventions are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 194-206 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Learning Disabilities Research and Practice |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 1 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 The Division for Learning Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Factors that May Influence Treatment Effects: Helping Practitioners Select Early Numeracy Interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS